256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19201357)
1. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer risk estimation: a preliminary study.
Kontos D; Bakic PR; Carton AK; Troxel AB; Conant EF; Maidment AD
Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):283-98. PubMed ID: 19201357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk assessment.
Kontos D; Ikejimba LC; Bakic PR; Troxel AB; Conant EF; Maidment AD
Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 21771961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association between Breast Parenchymal Complexity and False-Positive Recall From Digital Mammography Versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Preliminary Investigation in the ACRIN PA 4006 Trial.
Ray S; Chen L; Keller BM; Chen J; Conant EF; Kontos D
Acad Radiol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):977-86. PubMed ID: 27236612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK
Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast percent density: estimation on digital mammograms and central tomosynthesis projections.
Bakic PR; Carton AK; Kontos D; Zhang C; Troxel AB; Maidment AD
Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 19420321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast Cancer Conspicuity on Simultaneously Acquired Digital Mammographic Images versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
Korhonen KE; Conant EF; Cohen EA; Synnestvedt M; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31084481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening.
Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P
Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammographic density estimation: one-to-one comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using fully automated software.
Tagliafico A; Tagliafico G; Astengo D; Cavagnetto F; Rosasco R; Rescinito G; Monetti F; Calabrese M
Eur Radiol; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1265-70. PubMed ID: 22358426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis.
Lei J; Yang P; Zhang L; Wang Y; Yang K
Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):595-602. PubMed ID: 24121712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Margolis A; Lan L; Chinander MR
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 16039540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening Mammography Findings From One Standard Projection Only in the Era of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Cohen EO; Tso HH; Phalak KA; Mayo RC; Leung JWT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):445-451. PubMed ID: 29792742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital breast tomosynthesis within a symptomatic "one-stop breast clinic" for characterization of subtle findings.
Bansal GJ; Young P
Br J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 88(1053):20140855. PubMed ID: 26133221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as an imaging marker of endogenous hormonal exposure: a preliminary study in a high-risk population.
Daye D; Keller B; Conant EF; Chen J; Schnall MD; Maidment AD; Kontos D
Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):635-46. PubMed ID: 23570938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection and characterization of breast lesions in a selective diagnostic population: diagnostic accuracy study for comparison between one-view digital breast tomosynthesis and two-view full-field digital mammography.
Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150743. PubMed ID: 27072391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
