206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19202403)
1. What predicts local public health agency performance improvement? A pilot study in North Carolina.
Hajat A; Cilenti D; Harrison LM; MacDonald PD; Pavletic D; Mays GP; Baker EL
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2009; 15(2):E22-33. PubMed ID: 19202403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing types of local public health agencies in North Carolina.
Markiewicz M; Moore J; Foster JH; Berner M; Matthews G; Wall A
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2013; 19(5):451-60. PubMed ID: 23242382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Piloting a state health department accreditation model: the North Carolina experience.
Reed J; Pavletic D; Devlin L; Davis MV; Beitsch LM; Baker EL
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2009; 15(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 19202406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationships between local public health agency functions and agency leadership and staffing: a look at nurses.
Bekemeier B; Jones M
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(2):E8-16. PubMed ID: 20150786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Applying a Behavioral Model Framework for Disaster Recovery Research in Local Public Health Agencies: A Conceptual Approach.
Walsh L; Garrity S; Rutkow L; Thompson CB; Strauss-Riggs K; Altman BA; Schor K; Barnett DJ
Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2015 Aug; 9(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 25912850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determinants of the core functions of local public health agencies: examining what matters in local public health practice.
Remmert DM; O'Rourke T; Notaro SJ; Turnock B
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2013; 19(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 23446875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationship between local public health agency administrative variables and county health status rankings in Kentucky.
Harris AL; Scutchfield FD; Heise G; Ingram RC
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2014; 20(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 24435012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can voter-approved tax levies provide fiscal advantages and stability for local public health agencies?
Schmalzried HD; Fallon LF
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2013; 19(3):E14-9. PubMed ID: 23381114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The local public health agency workforce: research needs and practice realities.
Fraser MR
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2003; 9(6):496-9. PubMed ID: 14606188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The local public health workforce in rural communities.
Hajat A; Stewart K; Hayes KL
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2003; 9(6):481-8. PubMed ID: 14606186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. State health department accreditation: North Carolina.
Novick LF
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2009; 15(2):83-4. PubMed ID: 19202405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Back to basics: does decentralization improve health system performance? Evidence from Ceara in north-east Brazil.
Atkinson S; Haran D
Bull World Health Organ; 2004 Nov; 82(11):822-7. PubMed ID: 15640917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors associated with local public health agency participation in obesity prevention in southern States.
Hatala JJ; Fields TT
South Med J; 2015 May; 108(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 25972216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applying the model for improvement in a local health department: quality improvement as an effective approach in navigating the changing landscape of public health practice in Buncombe County, North Carolina.
Harrison LM; Shook ED; Harris G; Lea CS; Cornett A; Randolph GD
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2012; 18(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 22139306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accreditation/Performance assessment on-site reviews in Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, and Washington: implications for States and an evolving national model.
Butler J; Tews D; Raevsky C; Canavese J; Wojciehowski K; Michalak C; Thomas M; Brewster J; Mason M; Schmidt R
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2007; 13(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 17563629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the public's health: community diagnosis in North Carolina.
Surles KB; Blue KP
Public Health Rep; 1993; 108(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 8464976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The quality improvement experience in a high-performing local health department: Los Angeles County.
Gunzenhauser JD; Eggena ZP; Fielding JE; Smith KN; Jacobson DM; Bazini-Barakat N
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 20009643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An examination of environmental public health organizational and workforce configurations in the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic United States: how do we determine if these configurations impact performance?
Resnick BA; Zablotsky J; Janus ER; Maggy B; Burke TA
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2009; 15(6):509-17. PubMed ID: 19823156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality care and performance improvement.
Peters RA
N C Med J; 2004; 65(6):391. PubMed ID: 15714735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhancing the Maryland environmental public health workforce: a collaborative approach.
Resnick B; Zablotsky J; Farrow O; Glotfelty R; Heard P; Kelly S; Mitchell C; Phillips F; Burke T
J Environ Health; 2007; 70(1):32-6, 63. PubMed ID: 17802814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
