These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

909 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19202995)

  • 21. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
    Cejas C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
    Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
    Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process.
    Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 Apr; 82(4 Suppl):133-5. PubMed ID: 10889776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The fate of papers rejected by Australian Family Physician.
    Green R; Del Mar C
    Aust Fam Physician; 2006 Aug; 35(8):655-6. PubMed ID: 16915616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hindrance of conservation biology by delays in the submission of manuscripts.
    O'Donnell RP; Supp SR; Cobbold SM
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):615-20. PubMed ID: 20067489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The journal's development since the introduction of online manuscript submission and the double blinded peer review of manuscripts].
    Göbel U; Gortner L
    Klin Padiatr; 2010 Jul; 222(4):231-3. PubMed ID: 20665364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What happens to medical articles submitted in Spanish that are not accepted for publication?
    Matías-Guiu JA; García-Ramos R; Castellanos M; Martínez-Vila E; Matías-Guiu J
    Neurologia; 2013 May; 28(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 22795919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The destinies of the low- and middle-income country submissions.
    Konradsen J; Munk-Jørgensen A
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2007 Apr; 115(4):331-4. PubMed ID: 17355525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR.
    Chew FS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):627-32. PubMed ID: 1899764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Publication times, impact factors, and advance online publication in ophthalmology journals.
    Chen H; Chen CH; Jhanji V
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1697-701. PubMed ID: 23623355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal.
    Turcotte C; Drolet P; Girard M
    Can J Anaesth; 2004; 51(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 15197116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How a submitted manuscript is processed.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):853-5; quiz 856. PubMed ID: 19787169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of study outcome on submission and acceptance metrics for peer reviewed medical journals: six year retrospective review of all completed GlaxoSmithKline human drug research studies.
    Evoniuk G; Mansi B; DeCastro B; Sykes J
    BMJ; 2017 Apr; 357():j1726. PubMed ID: 28432051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How to review scientific manuscripts and clinical case reports for Journal of Oral Implantology.
    Rutkowski JL; Cairone JV
    J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(6):310-4. PubMed ID: 20017649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ethiopian Medical Journal: an overview assessment of the last 50 years.
    Enqueselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2012 Jan; 50 Suppl 1():1-58. PubMed ID: 23513408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Incidence and nature of unblinding by authors: our experience at two radiology journals with double-blinded peer review policies.
    Katz DS; Proto AV; Olmsted WW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1415-7. PubMed ID: 12438028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Exploring the relationship between impact factor and manuscript rejection rates in radiologic journals.
    Kurmis AP; Kurmis TP
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 16399035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study.
    Alam M; Kim NA; Havey J; Rademaker A; Ratner D; Tregre B; West DP; Coleman WP
    Br J Dermatol; 2011 Sep; 165(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 21623749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The impact factor and editorial decisions].
    Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
    Neurologia; 2008; 23(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 18597189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Significance of letters published in the Dutch Journal of Medicine, 1997/98].
    Mahesh S; Kabos M; Walvoort HC; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Mar; 145(11):531-5. PubMed ID: 11284288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.