These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19204373)

  • 1. Detecting selective sweeps: a new approach based on hidden markov models.
    Boitard S; Schlötterer C; Futschik A
    Genetics; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1567-78. PubMed ID: 19204373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting Positive Selection in Populations Using Genetic Data.
    Koropoulis A; Alachiotis N; Pavlidis P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2090():87-123. PubMed ID: 31975165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The pitfalls and virtues of population genetic summary statistics: Detecting selective sweeps in recent divergences.
    Schneider K; White TJ; Mitchell S; Adams CE; Reeve R; Elmer KR
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Jun; 34(6):893-909. PubMed ID: 33185292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On detecting incomplete soft or hard selective sweeps using haplotype structure.
    Ferrer-Admetlla A; Liang M; Korneliussen T; Nielsen R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 May; 31(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 24554778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating variable effective population sizes from multiple genomes: a sequentially markov conditional sampling distribution approach.
    Sheehan S; Harris K; Song YS
    Genetics; 2013 Jul; 194(3):647-62. PubMed ID: 23608192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of selective sweeps in structured populations: a comparison of recent methods.
    Vatsiou AI; Bazin E; Gaggiotti OE
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 26314386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population genetic processes affecting the mode of selective sweeps and effective population size in influenza virus H3N2.
    Kim K; Kim Y
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Aug; 16():156. PubMed ID: 27487769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian restoration of a hidden Markov chain with applications to DNA sequencing.
    Churchill GA; Lazareva B
    J Comput Biol; 1999; 6(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 10421527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating divergence time and ancestral effective population size of Bornean and Sumatran orangutan subspecies using a coalescent hidden Markov model.
    Mailund T; Dutheil JY; Hobolth A; Lunter G; Schierup MH
    PLoS Genet; 2011 Mar; 7(3):e1001319. PubMed ID: 21408205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinguishing between selective sweeps and demography using DNA polymorphism data.
    Jensen JD; Kim Y; DuMont VB; Aquadro CF; Bustamante CD
    Genetics; 2005 Jul; 170(3):1401-10. PubMed ID: 15911584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effects on Neutral Variability of Recurrent Selective Sweeps and Background Selection.
    Campos JL; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2019 May; 212(1):287-303. PubMed ID: 30923166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the strength of selective sweeps from deep population diversity data.
    Messer PW; Neher RA
    Genetics; 2012 Jun; 191(2):593-605. PubMed ID: 22491190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of selective sweeps using a dynamically adjusted number of linked microsatellites.
    Wiehe T; Nolte V; Zivkovic D; Schlötterer C
    Genetics; 2007 Jan; 175(1):207-18. PubMed ID: 17057237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A population genetic hidden Markov model for detecting genomic regions under selection.
    Kern AD; Haussler D
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):1673-85. PubMed ID: 20185453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ancestral Population Genomics with Jocx, a Coalescent Hidden Markov Model.
    Cheng JY; Mailund T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2090():167-189. PubMed ID: 31975168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data.
    Garud NR; Messer PW; Petrov DA
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1009373. PubMed ID: 33635910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discriminating between rate heterogeneity and interspecific recombination in DNA sequence alignments with phylogenetic factorial hidden Markov models.
    Husmeier D
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():ii166-72. PubMed ID: 16204097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptation in structured populations and fuzzy boundaries between hard and soft sweeps.
    Zheng Y; Wiehe T
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Nov; 15(11):e1007426. PubMed ID: 31710623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. HaploSweep: Detecting and Distinguishing Recent Soft and Hard Selective Sweeps through Haplotype Structure.
    Zhao S; Chi L; Fu M; Chen H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2024 Oct; 41(10):. PubMed ID: 39288167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection and Classification of Hard and Soft Sweeps from Unphased Genotypes by Multilocus Genotype Identity.
    Harris AM; Garud NR; DeGiorgio M
    Genetics; 2018 Dec; 210(4):1429-1452. PubMed ID: 30315068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.