These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? Sert B; Abeler V Int J Med Robot; 2007 Sep; 3(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 17924449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Kim YT; Kim SW; Hyung WJ; Lee SJ; Nam EJ; Lee WJ Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 18035405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Bandera CA; Magrina JF Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 21(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 19125000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Wright JD; Herzog TJ; Neugut AI; Burke WM; Lu YS; Lewin SN; Hershman DL Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22735788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review. Kruijdenberg CB; van den Einden LC; Hendriks JC; Zusterzeel PL; Bekkers RL Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Mar; 120(3):334-9. PubMed ID: 21236473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response to "a case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy". Nezhat F; Cho J; Chuang L Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):589-90; author reply 590-1. PubMed ID: 19954824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Letter to the Editor regarding "a case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy". Hall JB Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):588-9; author reply 590-1. PubMed ID: 19647306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Ramirez PT; Soliman PT; Schmeler KM; dos Reis R; Frumovitz M Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Sep; 110(3 Suppl 2):S21-4. PubMed ID: 18486966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy? Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):357.e1-7. PubMed ID: 18928973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Ko EM; Muto MG; Berkowitz RS; Feltmate CM Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]