These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19204661)

  • 21. Robotic radical parametrectomy in cervical cancer.
    Zapardiel I; Zanagnolo V; Magrina JF; Magtibay PM
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011; 72(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 21860209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vaginal robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (VRARH) after laparoscopic staging: feasibility and operative results.
    Oleszczuk A; Köhler C; Paulick J; Schneider A; Lanowska M
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Mar; 5(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 19153971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robotic radical hysterectomy in the management of gynecologic malignancies.
    Pareja R; Ramirez PT
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(6):673-6. PubMed ID: 18774759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: impact on fellowship training.
    Hoekstra AV; Morgan JM; Lurain JR; Buttin BM; Singh DK; Schink JC; Lowe MP
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 19446869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging and radical hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system.
    Shafer A; Boggess JF
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2 Suppl):S18-23. PubMed ID: 18771796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Study of surplus cost of robotic assistance for radical hysterectomy, versus laparotomy and standard laparoscopy].
    Dennis T; de Mendonça C; Phalippou J; Collinet P; Boulanger L; Weingertner F; Leblanc E; Narducci F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Feb; 40(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 22252053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.
    Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Fusco A; Malzoni C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1316-23. PubMed ID: 19224286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Zakashansky K; Lerner DL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):387-8; author reply 388. PubMed ID: 18439520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Re: "Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study".
    Nevin J; Luesley D
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Sep; 98(3):521-2; author reply 522-3. PubMed ID: 15913745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy--a randomised phase II trial: perioperative outcomes and surgicopathological measurements.
    Madhuri TK; Tailor A; Butler-Manuel S
    BJOG; 2011 Apr; 118(5):632-3; author reply 634. PubMed ID: 21392232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A model program for radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Asia Pacific perspective.
    Liang Z; Chen G; Xu H; Chen Y; Wang D
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2 Suppl):S37-44. PubMed ID: 19573705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Surgicopathologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy.
    Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Ciravolo G; Volpi E; Uccella S; Rampinelli F; Bergamini V
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Sep; 106(3):502-6. PubMed ID: 17553554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stages IIB, IIA and bulky stages IB) after concurrent chemoradiation therapy: surgical morbidity and oncological results.
    Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Gutowski M; Mourregot A; Fabbro M; Saint-Aubert B; Quenet F; Gourgou S; Kerr C; Rouanet P
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):404-9. PubMed ID: 19555996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Zhou J; Xiong BH; Ma L; Cheng Y; Huang W; Zhao L
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Mar; 12(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 25823530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Advances in surgical management of cervical cancer.
    Ercoli A; Iannone V; Legge F; Fagotti A; Fanfani F; Carone V; D'Asta M; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 19415066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: feasibility and technique.
    Magrina JF; Pawlina W; Kho RM; Magtibay PM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Jun; 121(3):605-9. PubMed ID: 21419478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy: the first report of LESS type III hysterectomy involves a woman with cervical cancer.
    Garrett LA; Boruta DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Dec; 207(6):518.e1-2. PubMed ID: 23111114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Laparoscopic Galvin-TeLinde hysterectomy for treatment of a microinvasive cervical carcinoma].
    Skret A; Obrzut B; Chruściel A
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(5):250-4. PubMed ID: 10408079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison between robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (RRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH): a case control study from EIO/Milan.
    Sert MB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 May; 117(2):389; author reply 389-90. PubMed ID: 20153028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
    Holloway RW; Finkler NJ; Pikaart DP; Bigsby GE; DeNardis SA; Ahmad S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 110(5):1174; author reply 1174-5. PubMed ID: 17978141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.