154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19204918)
1. Microbiological or chemical models of enamel secondary caries compared by polarized-light microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy.
Paradella TC; de Sousa FA; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Aug; 90(2):635-40. PubMed ID: 19204918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ability of different restorative materials to prevent in situ secondary caries: analysis by polarized light-microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray.
Paradella TC; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Aug; 116(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 18705806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Secondary caries formation with a two-species biofilm artificial mouth.
Amend S; Frankenberger R; Lücker S; Domann E; Krämer N
Dent Mater; 2018 May; 34(5):786-796. PubMed ID: 29544984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Glass ionomer cement inhibits secondary caries in an in vitro biofilm model.
Krämer N; Schmidt M; Lücker S; Domann E; Frankenberger R
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):1019-1031. PubMed ID: 28741172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of bioactive materials in preventing Streptococcus mutans-induced caries on enamel and dentine.
Contreras SM; Fernandes JB; Spinola MDS; Garcia MT; Junqueira JC; Bresciani E; Caneppele TMF
Eur J Oral Sci; 2023; 131(5-6):e12948. PubMed ID: 37583060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
Wilson RM; Donly KJ
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations.
Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani ; Zilm PS; Gully NJ
Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17969286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH.
Shabanian M; Richards LC
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 12131888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo vs in vitro anticariogenic behavior of glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
Papagiannoulis L; Kakaboura A; Eliades G
Dent Mater; 2002 Dec; 18(8):561-9. PubMed ID: 12385896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term evaluation of the remineralization of interproximal caries-like lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer restorations: a micro-CT study.
Lee HS; Berg JH; García-Godoy F; Jang KT
Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 18578183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions.
Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
Dent Mater; 1998 Jul; 14(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 10379259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials.
Attar N; Onen A
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002; 26(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11990054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mineral loss on adjacent enamel glass ionomer cements restorations after cariogenic and erosive challenges.
Salas CF; Guglielmi CA; Raggio DP; Mendes FM
Arch Oral Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(10):1014-9. PubMed ID: 21489401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation.
Sousa RP; Zanin IC; Lima JP; Vasconcelos SM; Melo MA; Beltrão HC; Rodrigues LK
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19026481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro caries inhibition by polyacid-modified composite resins ('compomers').
Millar BJ; Abiden F; Nicholson JW
J Dent; 1998 Mar; 26(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 9540310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations and in vitro secondary caries formation in coronal enamel.
Hicks MJ; Flaitz CM
Quintessence Int; 2000 Sep; 31(8):570-8. PubMed ID: 11203979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Susceptibility of restorations and adjacent enamel/dentine to erosion under different salivary flow conditions.
Alghilan MA; Cook NB; Platt JA; Eckert GJ; Hara AT
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1476-82. PubMed ID: 26476416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fluoride release from an orthodontic glass ionomer adhesive in vitro and enamel fluoride uptake in vivo.
Chatzistavrou E; Eliades T; Zinelis S; Athanasiou AE; Eliades G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):458.e1-8; discussion 458-9. PubMed ID: 20362902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
