These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19205524)

  • 21. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
    Zhang F; Boettcher FA; Sun XM
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of prolonged contralateral acoustic stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    van Zyl A; Swanepoel D; Hall JW
    Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 254(1-2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19401226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neurotoxicity of BFM-95 on the medial olivocochlear bundle assessed by means of contralateral suppression of 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Riga M; Korres S; Psarommatis I; Varvutsi M; Giotakis I; Papadas T; Ferekidis E; Apostolopoulos N
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Feb; 28(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 17255889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in pre-school children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 May; 132():109915. PubMed ID: 32028191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Occupational exposure to noise decreases otoacoustic emission efferent suppression.
    Sliwinska-Kowalska M; Kotylo P
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Mar; 41(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 12212856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Function of the medial olivocochlear system in children with phonological disorders.
    Didoné DD; Kunst LR; Weich TM; Tochetto TM; Mota HB
    J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol; 2011 Dec; 23(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 22231057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study.
    Bolay H; Bayazit YA; Gündüz B; Ugur AK; Akçali D; Altunyay S; Ilica S; Babacan A
    Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transient otoacoustic emissions in the detection of olivocochlear bundle maturation.
    Gkoritsa E; Tsakanikos M; Korres S; Dellagrammaticas H; Apostolopoulos N; Ferekidis E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Apr; 70(4):671-6. PubMed ID: 16198429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Concurrent measures of contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and of auditory steady-state responses.
    Mertes IB; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):2027. PubMed ID: 27914370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the olivocochlear efferent reflex strength in the susceptibility to temporary hearing deterioration after music exposure in young adults.
    Hannah K; Ingeborg D; Leen M; Annelies B; Birgit P; Freya S; Bart V
    Noise Health; 2014; 16(69):108-15. PubMed ID: 24804715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Low-frequency otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren measured by two commercial devices.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Piotrowska A; Kochanek K; Sliwa L; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 77(10):1724-8. PubMed ID: 23972827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contralateral acoustic stimulation induces a phase advance in evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Giraud AL; Perrin E; Chéry-Croze S; Chays A; Collet L
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):54-62. PubMed ID: 8789811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Utility of otoacoustic emissions and olivocochlear reflex in predicting vulnerability to noise-induced inner ear damage.
    Blioskas S; Tsalighopoulos M; Psillas G; Markou K
    Noise Health; 2018; 20(94):101-111. PubMed ID: 29785975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the growth of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Veuillet E; Duverdy-Bertholon F; Collet L
    Hear Res; 1996 Apr; 93(1-2):128-35. PubMed ID: 8735074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of age on contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human listeners with normal hearing.
    Kim S; Frisina DR; Frisina RD
    Audiol Neurootol; 2002; 7(6):348-57. PubMed ID: 12401966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Frequency specificity and left-ear advantage of medial olivocochlear efferent modulation: a study based on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission.
    Xing D; Gong Q
    Neuroreport; 2017 Sep; 28(13):775-778. PubMed ID: 28538522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory efferent feedback system deficits precede age-related hearing loss: contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in mice.
    Zhu X; Vasilyeva ON; Kim S; Jacobson M; Romney J; Waterman MS; Tuttle D; Frisina RD
    J Comp Neurol; 2007 Aug; 503(5):593-604. PubMed ID: 17559088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.