These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19206808)

  • 21. Spatial Release From Masking Under Different Reverberant Conditions in Young and Elderly Subjects: Effect of Moving or Stationary Maskers at Circular and Radial Conditions.
    Muñoz RV; Aspöck L; Fels J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 62(9):3582-3595. PubMed ID: 31525113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intelligibility in speech maskers with a binaural cochlear implant sound coding strategy inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Gorospe JM; Ruiz SSC; Benito F; Wilson BS
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():134-137. PubMed ID: 28188882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Binaural Glimpses at the Cocktail Party?
    Lingner A; Grothe B; Wiegrebe L; Ewert SD
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 17(5):461-73. PubMed ID: 27412529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of spatial separation in distance on the intelligibility of speech in rooms.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):757-67. PubMed ID: 25698010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):1967-77. PubMed ID: 25234995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.
    Bernstein JG; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Set-size procedures for controlling variations in speech-reception performance with a fluctuating masker.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2676-89. PubMed ID: 23039460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Enhancing listener strategies using a payoff matrix in speech-on-speech masking experiments.
    Thompson ER; Iyer N; Simpson BD; Wakefield GH; Kieras DE; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1297-304. PubMed ID: 26428768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
    Collin B; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.
    Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1627-37. PubMed ID: 19045654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modulation masking release using the Brazilian-Portuguese HINT: psychometric functions and the effect of speech time compression.
    Grose JH; Griz S; Pacífico FA; Advíncula KP; Menezes DC
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr; 54(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 25630394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spatial release from masking in reverberation for school-age children.
    Peng ZE; Pausch F; Fels J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3263. PubMed ID: 34852617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of interaural differences on speech intelligibility in complex multi-talker environments.
    Ellinger RL; Jakien KM; Gallun FJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):EL170. PubMed ID: 28253635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
    Leibold LJ; Yarnell Bonino A; Buss E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Explaining intelligibility in speech-modulated maskers using acoustic glimpse analysis.
    Gibbs BE; Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):EL449. PubMed ID: 29960446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.