357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19206818)
1. The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibility.
Dubbelboer F; Houtgast T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3937-46. PubMed ID: 19206818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
Jørgensen S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A detailed study on the effects of noise on speech intelligibility.
Dubbelboer F; Houtgast T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2865-71. PubMed ID: 18189576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise.
Miller SE; Schlauch RS; Watson PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 20649237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech perception of noise with binary gains.
Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2303-7. PubMed ID: 19062868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
Yang W; Bradley JS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Channel selection in the modulation domain for improved speech intelligibility in noise.
Wójcicki KK; Loizou PC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2904-13. PubMed ID: 22501068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
Hu Y; Loizou PC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1777. PubMed ID: 17927437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The dynamic range of speech, compression, and its effect on the speech reception threshold in stationary and interrupted noise.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3236-45. PubMed ID: 20000937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
Roman N; Woodruff J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modifying the normalized covariance metric measure to account for nonlinear distortions introduced by noise-reduction algorithms.
Chen F; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL405-11. PubMed ID: 23656101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: dependency on signal-to-noise ratios.
Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):531-9. PubMed ID: 22280614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using a signal cancellation technique to assess adaptive directivity of hearing aids.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):496-511. PubMed ID: 17614507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of objective measures for intelligibility prediction of time-frequency weighted noisy speech.
Taal CH; Hendriks RC; Heusdens R; Jensen J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3013-27. PubMed ID: 22087929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of the influence of reverberation on binaural speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet.
Rennies J; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 22087928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Segregation of unvoiced speech from nonspeech interference.
Hu G; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1306-19. PubMed ID: 18681616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
