These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19207193)

  • 1. Disentangling effects of auditory distraction and of stimulus-response sequence.
    Roeber U; Berti S; Müller D; Widmann A; Schröger E
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):425-38. PubMed ID: 19207193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
    Muller-Gass A; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Specific or general? The nature of attention set changes triggered by distracting auditory events.
    Horváth J; Roeber U; Bendixen A; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1229():193-203. PubMed ID: 18634759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimizing the auditory distraction paradigm: behavioral and event-related potential effects in a lateralized multi-deviant approach.
    Grimm S; Schröger E; Bendixen A; Bäss P; Roye A; Deouell LY
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 119(4):934-47. PubMed ID: 18289933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
    SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.
    Corral MJ; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary motor area contribution to attentional reorienting after distraction.
    Horváth J; Maess B; Berti S; Schröger E
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 18287943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduced novelty-P3 associated with increased behavioral distractibility in schizophrenia.
    Cortiñas M; Corral MJ; Garrido G; Garolera M; Pajares M; Escera C
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul; 78(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 18450358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task.
    Horváth J; Czigler I; Birkás E; Winkler I; Gervai J
    Neurobiol Aging; 2009 Jul; 30(7):1157-72. PubMed ID: 18023507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development of involuntary and voluntary attention from childhood to adulthood: a combined behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Wetzel N; Widmann A; Berti S; Schröger E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Oct; 117(10):2191-203. PubMed ID: 16926109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related potentials and secondary task performance during simulated driving.
    Wester AE; Böcker KB; Volkerts ER; Verster JC; Kenemans JL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18215526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive control after distraction: event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation.
    Berti S
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jul; 45(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 18346043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic detection of lexical change: an auditory event-related potential study.
    Muller-Gass A; Roye A; Kirmse U; Saupe K; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(16):1747-51. PubMed ID: 17921880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response repetition vs. response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distraction.
    Roeber U; Berti S; Widmann A; Schröger E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):451-6. PubMed ID: 15722214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two Simon tasks with different sources of conflict: an ERP study of motion- and location-based compatibility effects.
    Galashan D; Wittfoth M; Fehr T; Herrmann M
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul; 78(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 18436365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task.
    Parmentier FB; Elford G; Escera C; Andrés P; San Miguel I
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):408-32. PubMed ID: 17445791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention rivalry under irrelevant audiovisual stimulation.
    Feng T; Qiu Y; Zhu Y; Tong S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun; 438(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 18482799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional load of the primary task influences the frontal but not the temporal generators of mismatch negativity.
    Restuccia D; Della Marca G; Marra C; Rubino M; Valeriani M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):891-9. PubMed ID: 16289727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Negative emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing.
    Domínguez-Borràs J; Garcia-Garcia M; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 18287956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.