These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19207308)

  • 41. Inter-observer reproducibility of endometrial cytology by the Osaki Study Group method: utilising the Becton Dickinson SurePath
    Norimatsu Y; Yamaguchi T; Taira T; Abe H; Sakamoto H; Takenaka M; Yanoh K; Yoshinobu M; Irino S; Hirai Y; Kobayashi TK
    Cytopathology; 2016 Dec; 27(6):472-478. PubMed ID: 27109167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology in cervical cancer screening.
    Akamatsu S; Kodama S; Himeji Y; Ikuta N; Shimagaki N
    Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 22846595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Combining endometrium sampling device and SurePath preparation to screen for endometrial carcinoma: a validation study.
    Wen J; Chen R; Zhao J; Dong Y; Yang X; Liao QP
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Mar; 128(5):648-53. PubMed ID: 25698198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of SurePath® and ThinPrep® liquid-based cervical cytology using positive predictive value, atypical predictive value and total predictive value as performance indicators.
    Wright PK; Marshall J; Desai M
    Cytopathology; 2010 Dec; 21(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 20545727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of PAP smear and liquid based cytology as a screening method for cervical carcinoma.
    Khakwani M; Parveen R; Azhar M
    Pak J Med Sci; 2022; 38(7):1827-1831. PubMed ID: 36246719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Rapid pre-screening is more sensitive in liquid-based cytology than in conventional smears.
    Dudding N; Renshaw AA; Ellis K
    Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 21135523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Glandular Cell Abnormalities on SurePath Preparations: A Retrospective Review with Cytology-Histology Correlations.
    Fischer G; Cormier K
    Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(5-6):423-429. PubMed ID: 30244241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Uterobrush method in the detection of endometrial pathology.
    Iavazzo C; Vorgias G; Mastorakos G; Stefanatou G; Panoussi A; Alexiadou A; Plyta S; Lekka C; Kalinoglou N; Dertimas V; Akrivos T; Fotiou S
    Anticancer Res; 2011 Oct; 31(10):3469-74. PubMed ID: 21965763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Abnormal cervical cytology in the diagnosis of uterine papillary serous carcinoma: earlier detection of a poor prognostic cancer subtype?
    Skaznik-Wikiel ME; Ueda SM; Frasure HE; Rose PG; Fleury A; Grumbine FC; Fader AN
    Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 21525737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Does Cytological Laboratory Holds the Responsibility for the Low Sensitivity of the PAP Test in Detecting Endometrial Cancer?
    Milicić V; Matić TS; Martinek V; Tomasković I; Ramljak V
    Coll Antropol; 2015 Sep; 39(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 26898071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology for Cervical Cancer Screening.
    Patel N; Bavikar R; Buch A; Kulkarni M; Dharwadkar A; Viswanathan V
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2023; 12(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 37416097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Detecting uterine glandular lesions: Role of cervical cytology.
    Bansal B; Gupta P; Gupta N; Rajwanshi A; Suri V
    Cytojournal; 2016; 13():3. PubMed ID: 27014363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Liquid-based cytology test use by office-based physicians: United States, 2006-2007.
    Hing E; Saraiya M; Roland KB
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2011 Jun; (40):1-6. PubMed ID: 21692417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Efficacy of liquid-based genetic diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
    Matsuura M; Yamaguchi K; Tamate M; Satohisa S; Teramoto M; Iwasaki M; Sugita S; Hasegawa T; Koubo R; Takane K; Ikenoue T; Furukawa Y; Saito T
    Cancer Sci; 2018 Dec; 109(12):4025-4032. PubMed ID: 30289582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of the conventional cervical smear and liquid-based cytology: results of a controlled, prospective study in the Abruzzo Region of Italy.
    Maccallini V; Angeloni C; Caraceni D; Fortunato C; Venditti MA; Di Gabriele G; Antonelli C; Lattanzi A; Puliti D; Ciatto S; Confortini M; Sani C; Zappa M
    Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 18833819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of endometrial cytology prepared with the Becton Dickinson SurePath™ method: a pilot study by the Osaki Study Group.
    Yanoh K; Norimatsu Y; Munakata S; Yamamoto T; Nakamura Y; Murata T; Kobayashi TK; Hirai Y
    Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 24503811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Liquid-based Papanicolaou tests in endometrial carcinoma diagnosis. Performance, error root cause analysis, and quality improvement.
    Sams SB; Currens HS; Raab SS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Feb; 137(2):248-54. PubMed ID: 22261450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Diagnostic Value of Routine Papanicolaou Smears for Detecting Endometrial Cancers: An Update.
    Lai CR; Hsu CY; Hang JF; Li AF
    Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 26315394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The advantages of incorporating liquid-based cytology (TACAS™) in mass screening for cervical cancer.
    Yokoyama Y; Futagami M; Watanabe J; Sakuraba A; Nagasawa K; Maruyama H; Sato S
    Hum Cell; 2016 Apr; 29(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 26739336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cytologic features of the endometrial adenocarcinoma: comparison of ThinPrep and BD SurePath preparations.
    Norimatsu Y; Sakamoto S; Ohsaki H; Ozaki S; Yokoyama T; Shimizu K; Yanoh K; Akiyama M; Bamba M; Kobayashi TK
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Aug; 41(8):673-81. PubMed ID: 23440947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.