239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19208372)
1. An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary.
Harbord RM; Whiting P; Sterne JA; Egger M; Deeks JJ; Shang A; Bachmann LM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19208372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Moses-Littenberg meta-analytical method generates systematic differences in test accuracy compared to hierarchical meta-analytical models.
Dinnes J; Mallett S; Hopewell S; Roderick PJ; Deeks JJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 80():77-87. PubMed ID: 27485293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Harbord RM; Deeks JJ; Egger M; Whiting P; Sterne JA
Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):239-51. PubMed ID: 16698768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy with few studies or sparse data.
Takwoingi Y; Guo B; Riley RD; Deeks JJ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1896-1911. PubMed ID: 26116616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
Leeflang MM; Deeks JJ; Gatsonis C; Bossuyt PM;
Ann Intern Med; 2008 Dec; 149(12):889-97. PubMed ID: 19075208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
Dinnes J; Deeks J; Kirby J; Roderick P
Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(12):1-113, iii. PubMed ID: 15774235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of simple pooling and bivariate model used in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy published in Chinese journals].
Huang YS; Yang ZR; Zhan SY
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Jun; 47(3):483-8. PubMed ID: 26080880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Meta-DiSc 2.0: a web application for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data.
Plana MN; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Fernández-García S; Soto J; Fabregate M; Pérez T; Roqué M; Zamora J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):306. PubMed ID: 36443653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
Wang F; Gatsonis CA
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
Macaskill P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis.
Lee J; Kim KW; Choi SH; Huh J; Park SH
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(6):1188-96. PubMed ID: 26576107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When are summary ROC curves appropriate for diagnostic meta-analyses?
Chappell FM; Raab GM; Wardlaw JM
Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(21):2653-68. PubMed ID: 19591118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.
Liu Y; Chen Y; Chu H
Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25358907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of an interactive web-based tool to conduct and interrogate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: MetaDTA.
Freeman SC; Kerby CR; Patel A; Cooper NJ; Quinn T; Sutton AJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):81. PubMed ID: 30999861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence diagnostics and outlier detection for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
Matsushima Y; Noma H; Yamada T; Furukawa TA
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 31724796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survey revealed a lack of clarity about recommended methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy data.
Ochodo EA; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Leeflang MM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1281-8. PubMed ID: 23998917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
Leeflang MM
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Feb; 20(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 24274632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Graphical enhancements to summary receiver operating characteristic plots to facilitate the analysis and reporting of meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data.
Patel A; Cooper N; Freeman S; Sutton A
Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jan; 12(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 32706182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
