166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19208724)
1. Re: Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Pereira C; Castilho E
Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 169(6):783; author reply 783-4. PubMed ID: 19208724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selective reporting of adjusted estimates in observational epidemiology studies: reasons and implications for meta-analyses.
Peters J; Mengersen K
Eval Health Prof; 2008 Dec; 31(4):370-89. PubMed ID: 19000980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Considerations for planning and designing meta-analysis in oral medicine.
Pinto A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Aug; 116(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 23663987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. From observational studies to randomized trials: asking the right question at the right time.
Neaton JD; Mugglin AS
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Aug; 33(8):517-9. PubMed ID: 16899092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ten questions to consider when interpreting results of a meta-epidemiological study-the MetaBLIND study as a case.
Moustgaard H; Jones HE; Savović J; Clayton GL; Sterne JA; Higgins JP; Hróbjartsson A
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):260-274. PubMed ID: 31851427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deriving treatment recommendations from evidence within randomized trials. The role and limitation of meta-analysis.
Freemantle N; Mason J; Eccles M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 10507190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
Shahar E; Shahar DJ
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies.
Egger M; Schneider M; Davey Smith G
BMJ; 1998 Jan; 316(7125):140-4. PubMed ID: 9462324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Practical application of nonrandomized research to patient care: a case study of nesiritide.
Winegardner ML; Reaume KT; Dabaja GS; Kalus JS
Pharmacotherapy; 2007 Jan; 27(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17192168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical and updated guidelines on performing meta-analyses of non-randomized studies in interventional cardiology.
Navarese EP; Koziński M; Pafundi T; Andreotti F; Buffon A; Servi SD; Kubica J
Cardiol J; 2011; 18(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21305479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Danger of misuse of meta-analyses for observational studies based on published data.
Sauerbrei W; Blettner M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():33. PubMed ID: 11187567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Commentary: Empirical evidence of attrition bias in clinical trials.
Jüni P; Egger M
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):87-8. PubMed ID: 15649954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
Stewart LA; Parmar MK; Tierney JF
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):61; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
Ioannidis JP; Cappelleri JC; Lau J
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):59; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Observational studies and randomized trials.
Kunz R; Khan KS; Neumayer HH
N Engl J Med; 2000 Oct; 343(16):1194-5; author reply 1196-7. PubMed ID: 11041757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
