166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19208724)
21. Controversy over "contradiction": Should randomized trials always trump observational studies?
Fletcher AE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 147(3):384-6. PubMed ID: 19217953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Causation, bias and confounding: a hitchhiker's guide to the epidemiological galaxy Part 2. Principles of causality in epidemiological research: confounding, effect modification and strength of association.
Shapiro S
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2008 Jul; 34(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 18577320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. How Do You Know Which Health Care Effectiveness Research You Can Trust? A Guide to Study Design for the Perplexed.
Soumerai SB; Starr D; Majumdar SR
Prev Chronic Dis; 2015 Jun; 12():E101. PubMed ID: 26111157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. PEDro's bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysis.
da Costa BR; Hilfiker R; Egger M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 23177896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Methodology and application of clinical trials in radiology: self-assessment module.
Black WC; Krupinski EA; Relyea-Chew A; Chew FS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Mar; 190(3 Suppl):S23-8. PubMed ID: 18321845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Network meta-analysis incorporating randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative cohort studies for assessing the safety and effectiveness of medical treatments: challenges and opportunities.
Cameron C; Fireman B; Hutton B; Clifford T; Coyle D; Wells G; Dormuth CR; Platt R; Toh S
Syst Rev; 2015 Nov; 4():147. PubMed ID: 26537988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Confounding in health research.
Greenland S; Morgenstern H
Annu Rev Public Health; 2001; 22():189-212. PubMed ID: 11274518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Negative Control Outcomes: A Tool to Detect Bias in Randomized Trials.
Arnold BF; Ercumen A
JAMA; 2016 Dec; 316(24):2597-2598. PubMed ID: 28027378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. PRISMAtic reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Jüni P; Egger M
Lancet; 2009 Oct; 374(9697):1221-3. PubMed ID: 19819375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Observational studies of drugs and mortality.
Ray WA
N Engl J Med; 2005 Dec; 353(22):2319-21. PubMed ID: 16319379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies].
Schaffer P; Velten M
Rev Prat; 2002 May; 52(10):1131-7. PubMed ID: 12107937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Introduction to observational studies: part 2.
Pandis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):268-9. PubMed ID: 24485743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. When are observational studies as credible as randomised trials?
Vandenbroucke JP
Lancet; 2004 May; 363(9422):1728-31. PubMed ID: 15158638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Non-Randomized Studies of Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Thiazolidinediones and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Application of a New Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
Bilandzic A; Fitzpatrick T; Rosella L; Henry D
PLoS Med; 2016 Apr; 13(4):e1001987. PubMed ID: 27046153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Large-scale randomized evidence: large, simple trials and overviews of trials.
Peto R; Collins R; Gray R
J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 7853045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Can quality of clinical trials and meta-analyses be quantified?
Ioannidis JP; Lau J
Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9128):590-1. PubMed ID: 9746014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Roaming through the methodology. XX. Randomization as a means of avoiding confounding through indication].
Zielhuis GA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Aug; 144(32):1528-31. PubMed ID: 10949635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Randomized controlled trials 1: Design.
Curtis BM; Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():159-75. PubMed ID: 25694309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in clinical research: a review of methods and applications.
Verde PE; Ohmann C
Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 26035469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches.
Little RJ; Rubin DB
Annu Rev Public Health; 2000; 21():121-45. PubMed ID: 10884949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
