309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19209502)
1. Care to compare?
Aston G
Hosp Health Netw; 2008 Dec; 82(12):38-41, 1. PubMed ID: 19209502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Getting to 'smart' health care.
Clancy CM
Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(6):w589-92. PubMed ID: 17090557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technology assessment in healthcare: a review and description of a "best practice" technology assessment process.
Fernandez AM; Schrogie JJ; Wilson WW; Nash DB
Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc; 1997; 2(6):240-53. PubMed ID: 9543920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can a center for comparative effectiveness information succeed? Perspectives from a health care company.
Buto K; Juhn P
Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(6):w586-8. PubMed ID: 17090556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developing a center for comparative effectiveness information.
Wilensky GR
Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(6):w572-85. PubMed ID: 17090555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation.
Brazier J; Deverill M; Green C; Harper R; Booth A
Health Technol Assess; 1999; 3(9):i-iv, 1-164. PubMed ID: 10392311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The emerging context for advances in comparative effectiveness assessment.
Rowe JW; Cortese DA; McGinnis JM
Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(6):w593-5. PubMed ID: 17090558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical Appraisal of Health Professions Research.
Truluck CA; Leggett T
Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(3):355-8. PubMed ID: 26721851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Challenges for cost-effectiveness research.
Weinstein MC
Med Decis Making; 1986; 6(4):194-8. PubMed ID: 3095604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The evaluation of telemedicine and health services research.
Grigsby J; Brega AG; Devore PA
Telemed J E Health; 2005 Jun; 11(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 16035929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Theory and methods of economic evaluation of health care.
Johannesson M
Dev Health Econ Public Policy; 1996; 4():1-245. PubMed ID: 10158916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Health technology assessment in the United States. Past, present, and future.
Eisenberg JM; Zarin D
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 12053419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Technology assessment and public health.
Power EJ; Tunis SR; Wagner JL
Annu Rev Public Health; 1994; 15():561-79. PubMed ID: 8054099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rehabilitation research: we should care and we should act.
Segal NA
PM R; 2010 Jul; 2(7):591-8. PubMed ID: 20659714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Closer inspection: the recent evolution of technology assessment.
Goodman CS
Health Syst Rev; 1997; 30(2):38-40, 42, 44. PubMed ID: 10165990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health economic guidelines--similarities, differences and some implications.
Hjelmgren J; Berggren F; Andersson F
Value Health; 2001; 4(3):225-50. PubMed ID: 11705185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian methods for design and analysis of cost-effectiveness trials in the evaluation of health care technologies.
O'Hagan A; Stevens JW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2002 Dec; 11(6):469-90. PubMed ID: 12516985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health Technology Assessment in the UK.
Raftery J; Powell J
Lancet; 2013 Oct; 382(9900):1278-85. PubMed ID: 24120204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons.
Moses H; Matheson DH; Cairns-Smith S; George BP; Palisch C; Dorsey ER
JAMA; 2015 Jan; 313(2):174-89. PubMed ID: 25585329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Health technology assessment: II. Cost effectiveness analysis].
Secoli SR; Nita ME; Ono-Nita SK; Nobre M
Arq Gastroenterol; 2010; 47(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 21225140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
