These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19210062)

  • 1. The impact of repetition-induced familiarity on agreement with weak and strong arguments.
    Moons WG; Mackie DM; Garcia-Marques T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 19210062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating science arguments: evidence, uncertainty, and argument strength.
    Corner A; Hahn U
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 19751071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of minority/majority source status on attitude certainty: a matching perspective.
    Tormala ZL; Desensi VL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jan; 35(1):114-25. PubMed ID: 19106081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptions of entitativity and attitude change.
    Rydell RJ; McConnell AR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Jan; 31(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 15574665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relevance override: on the reduced impact of "cues" under high-motivation conditions of persuasion studies.
    Pierro A; Mannetti L; Kruglanski AW; Sleeth-Keppler D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 86(2):251-64. PubMed ID: 14769082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thinking straight while seeing red: the influence of anger on information processing.
    Moons WG; Mackie DM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 May; 33(5):706-20. PubMed ID: 17440205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating arguments during instigations of defence motivation and accuracy motivation.
    Liu CH
    Br J Psychol; 2017 May; 108(2):296-317. PubMed ID: 26973222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Remembering makes evidence compelling: retrieval from memory can give rise to the illusion of truth.
    Ozubko JD; Fugelsang J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):270-6. PubMed ID: 21058878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Horcajo J; Petty RE; Briñol P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Sep; 99(3):498-512. PubMed ID: 20649371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Listening, not watching: situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception.
    Reinhard MA; Sporer SL; Scharmach M; Marksteiner T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Sep; 101(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 21707196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minority versus majority influence and uncertainty orientation: processing persuasive messages on the basis of situational expectancies.
    Shuper PA; Sorrentino RM
    J Soc Psychol; 2004 Apr; 144(2):127-47. PubMed ID: 15074502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncertainty orientation in the group context: categorization effects on persuasive message processing.
    Hodson G; Sorrentino RM
    J Soc Psychol; 2003 Jun; 143(3):291-312. PubMed ID: 12846514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Briñol P; Petty RE; Barden J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Nov; 93(5):711-27. PubMed ID: 17983296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of familiarity level and repetition on recognition accuracy.
    Tussing AA; Greene RL
    Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 11258228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of fear appeals on processing and acceptance of action recommendations.
    de Hoog N; Stroebe W; de Wit JB
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Jan; 31(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 15574659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attitudinal ambivalence and message-based persuasion: motivated processing of proattitudinal information and avoidance of counterattitudinal information.
    Clark JK; Wegener DT; Fabrigar LR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Apr; 34(4):565-77. PubMed ID: 18340037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
    Hahn U; Oaksford M
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The pursuit of self-interest: self-interest bias in attitude judgment and persuasion.
    Darke PR; Chaiken S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Dec; 89(6):864-83. PubMed ID: 16393021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The interplay of controlled and automatic processing in the expression of spontaneously inferred traits: A PDP analysis.
    McCarthy RJ; Skowronski JJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Feb; 100(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 21299314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Loyal deviance: testing the normative conflict model of dissent in social groups.
    Packer DJ; Chasteen AL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Jan; 36(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 19907038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.