101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19210104)
1. Additive and interactive effects of stimulus degradation: no challenge for CDP+.
Ziegler JC; Perry C; Zorzi M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):306-11. PubMed ID: 19210104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Additivity of factor effects in reading tasks is still a challenge for computational models: Reply to Ziegler, Perry, and Zorzi (2009).
Besner D; O'Malley S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):312-6. PubMed ID: 19210105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reading aloud: qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context.
O'Malley S; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1400-11. PubMed ID: 18980404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud.
Perry C; Ziegler JC; Zorzi M
Psychol Rev; 2007 Apr; 114(2):273-315. PubMed ID: 17500628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond single syllables: large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model.
Perry C; Ziegler JC; Zorzi M
Cogn Psychol; 2010 Sep; 61(2):106-51. PubMed ID: 20510406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the joint effects of stimulus quality, regularity, and lexicality when reading aloud: new challenges.
Besner D; O'Malley S; Robidoux S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):750-64. PubMed ID: 20438270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reading aloud: On the determinants of the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency.
White D; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):749-756. PubMed ID: 27936847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nonword reading: comparing dual-route cascaded and connectionist dual-process models with human data.
Pritchard SC; Coltheart M; Palethorpe S; Castles A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1268-88. PubMed ID: 22309087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).
O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 17352625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reading aloud: does previous trial history modulate the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency?
O'Malley S; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1321-5. PubMed ID: 23855551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
Yap MJ; Balota DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neighborhood effects in reading aloud: new findings and new challenges for computational models.
Mulatti C; Reynolds MG; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):799-810. PubMed ID: 16846280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Constraints on computational models of basic processes in reading.
Besner D; Wartak S; Robidoux S
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):242-50. PubMed ID: 18248152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do current connectionist learning models account for reading development in different languages?
Hutzler F; Ziegler JC; Perry C; Wimmer H; Zorzi M
Cognition; 2004 Apr; 91(3):273-96. PubMed ID: 15168898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reading aloud: when the effect of stimulus quality distinguishes between cascaded and thresholded components.
Blais C; Besner D
Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 17725162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the role of set when reading aloud: a dissociation between prelexical and lexical processing.
Paulitzki JR; Risko EF; O'Malley S; Stolz JA; Besner D
Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 19144540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The cross-script length effect: further evidence challenging PDP models of reading aloud.
Rastle K; Havelka J; Wydell TN; Coltheart M; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19210093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Syllables and bigrams: orthographic redundancy and syllabic units affect visual word recognition at different processing levels.
Conrad M; Carreiras M; Tamm S; Jacobs AM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):461-79. PubMed ID: 19331501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
Yap MJ; Balota DA; Cortese MJ; Watson JM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1324-44. PubMed ID: 17154775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.
Coltheart M; Rastle K; Perry C; Langdon R; Ziegler J
Psychol Rev; 2001 Jan; 108(1):204-56. PubMed ID: 11212628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
