These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19210306)

  • 1. A simple and practical approach to evaluate implant positioning immediately after placement.
    Chowdhary R
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):363-5. PubMed ID: 19210306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A case for routine computed tomography imaging of the dental alveolus before implant placement.
    Kraut RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jan; 59(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 11152191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conversion of an implant radiographic template into a surgical template.
    Sykaras N; Woody RD
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Jun; 10(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 11512118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic evaluation of dental implants placed using an osteotome technique.
    Leblebicioglu B; Ersanli S; Karabuda C; Tosun T; Gokdeniz H
    J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 15857072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A surgical guide for dental implant placement in an edentulous jaw.
    Wat PY; Pow EH; Chau FS; Leung KC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):323-5. PubMed ID: 18922263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preorthodontic implant placement in the planned postorthodontic position: a simplified technique and clinical report.
    Solow RA
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(4):e193-203. PubMed ID: 22782051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cast-based guided implant placement: a novel technique.
    Stumpel LJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 100(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 18589077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements.
    Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Nummikoski PV; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11515994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-guided surgery utilizing a computer-milled surgical template.
    Klein M; Abrams M
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 13(2):165-9; quiz 170. PubMed ID: 11315436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple, safe and affordable cast-based guided implant placement system.
    Stumpel LJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Mar; 43(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 25864302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A case against routine computed tomography imaging of the dental alveolus before implant placement.
    Pieper SP; Lewis SG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jan; 59(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 11152192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flapless implant surgery for replacement of posterior teeth.
    Cloyd JS
    Dent Today; 2008 Dec; 27(12):64, 66, 68-9. PubMed ID: 19133634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Divergence correction associated with implant placement: a radiographic study.
    Mayer Y; Machtei EE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1033-9. PubMed ID: 20162106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional templates for placement of root-form dental implants: a technical note.
    Higginbottom FL; Wilson TG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(6):787-93. PubMed ID: 8990642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immediate non-occlusal vs. early loading of dental implants in partially edentulous patients: a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Peri-implant bone and soft-tissue levels.
    Galli F; Capelli M; Zuffetti F; Testori T; Esposito M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jun; 19(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 18422981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prosthetically determined implant placement for the partially edentulous ridge: a reality today.
    Mason WE; Rugani FC
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1999; 81(9):28, 30, 32, 34-7. PubMed ID: 10686930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flapless implant placement: a technique to eliminate the need for a removable interim prosthesis.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 18762035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of implant angulation and impression technique on impressions of NobelActive implants.
    Alexander Hazboun GB; Masri R; Romberg E; Kempler J; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):425-31. PubMed ID: 25749089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.
    Katsoulis J; Pazera P; Mericske-Stern R
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 18783423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiographic stents: integrating treatment planning and implant placement.
    De Kok IJ; Thalji G; Bryington M; Cooper LF
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 58(1):181-92. PubMed ID: 24286652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.