These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19210531)

  • 1. Evolution of sexual size dimorphisms in emydid turtles: ecological dimorphism, rensch's rule, and sympatric divergence.
    Stephens PR; Wiens JJ
    Evolution; 2009 Apr; 63(4):910-25. PubMed ID: 19210531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual selection, sexual size dimorphism and Rensch's rule in Odonata.
    Serrano-Meneses MA; Córdoba-Aguilar A; Azpilicueta-Amorín M; González-Soriano E; Székely T
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1259-73. PubMed ID: 18636976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ecological divergence and sexual selection drive sexual size dimorphism in New World pitvipers (Serpentes: Viperidae).
    Hendry CR; Guiher TJ; Pyron RA
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Apr; 27(4):760-71. PubMed ID: 24597708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rensch's rule inverted--female-driven gigantism in nine-spined stickleback Pungitius pungitius.
    Herczeg G; Gonda A; Merilä J
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 May; 79(3):581-8. PubMed ID: 20202005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in grouse and allies (Aves: Phasianidae) in relation to mating competition, fecundity demands and resource division.
    Lislevand T; Figuerola J; Székely T
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1895-905. PubMed ID: 19682306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proximate causes of Rensch's rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time?
    Blanckenhorn WU; Dixon AF; Fairbairn DJ; Foellmer MW; Gibert P; van der Linde K; Meier R; Nylin S; Pitnick S; Schoff C; Signorelli M; Teder T; Wiklund C
    Am Nat; 2007 Feb; 169(2):245-57. PubMed ID: 17211807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: testing two hypotheses for Rensch's rule in the water strider Aquarius remigis.
    Fairbairn DJ
    Am Nat; 2005 Oct; 166 Suppl 4():S69-84. PubMed ID: 16224713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Macroevolutionary pattern of sexual size dimorphism in geckos corresponds to intraspecific temperature-induced variation.
    Starostová Z; Kubicka L; Kratochvíl L
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Apr; 23(4):670-7. PubMed ID: 20487136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual size dimorphism in a Drosophila clade, the D. obscura group.
    Huey RB; Moreteau B; Moreteau JC; Gibert P; Gilchrist GW; Ives AR; Garland T; David JR
    Zoology (Jena); 2006; 109(4):318-30. PubMed ID: 16978850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlated evolution of allometry and sexual dimorphism across higher taxa.
    De Lisle SP; Rowe L
    Am Nat; 2013 Nov; 182(5):630-9. PubMed ID: 24107370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lack of support for Rensch's rule in an intraspecific test using red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum) populations.
    Martin OY; Michalczyk Ł; Millard AL; Emerson BC; Gage MJ
    Insect Sci; 2017 Feb; 24(1):133-140. PubMed ID: 26299521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Andrew meets Rensch: sexual size dimorphism and the inverse of Rensch's rule in Andrew's toad (Bufo andrewsi).
    Liao WB; Liu WC; Merilä J
    Oecologia; 2015 Feb; 177(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 25407623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phylogeny suggests nondirectional and isometric evolution of sexual size dimorphism in argiopine spiders.
    Cheng RC; Kuntner M
    Evolution; 2014 Oct; 68(10):2861-72. PubMed ID: 25130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual size dimorphism in caecilian amphibians: analysis, review and directions for future research.
    Kupfer A
    Zoology (Jena); 2009; 112(5):362-9. PubMed ID: 19433349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can sexual selection drive female life histories? A comparative study on Galliform birds.
    Kolm N; Stein RW; Mooers AØ; Verspoor JJ; Cunningham EJ
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Mar; 20(2):627-38. PubMed ID: 17305829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A test of Rensch's rule in greater horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) with female-biased sexual size dimorphism.
    Wu H; Jiang T; Huang X; Lin H; Wang H; Wang L; Niu H; Feng J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86085. PubMed ID: 24465886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The macroevolutionary dynamics of mammalian sexual size dimorphism.
    Jones ME; Sheard C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Nov; 290(2011):20231211. PubMed ID: 37964522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Only half right: species with female-biased sexual size dimorphism consistently break Rensch's rule.
    Webb TJ; Freckleton RP
    PLoS One; 2007 Sep; 2(9):e897. PubMed ID: 17878932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual dichromatism in wing pigmentation of New World dragonflies follows Rensch's rule.
    Santos ES; Machado G
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1447-54. PubMed ID: 27169873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alternative mating strategies and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana: a population-level comparative analysis.
    Corl A; Davis AR; Kuchta SR; Comendant T; Sinervo B
    Evolution; 2010 Jan; 64(1):79-96. PubMed ID: 19659598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.