175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19210586)
1. Condition-dependent mutation rates and sexual selection.
Cotton S
J Evol Biol; 2009 Apr; 22(4):899-906. PubMed ID: 19210586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load through selection on males.
Whitlock MC; Agrawal AF
Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):569-82. PubMed ID: 19154364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evolutionary dynamics of a sexual ornament in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): the role of indirect selection within and between sexes.
Jensen H; Steinsland I; Ringsby TH; Saether BE
Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1275-93. PubMed ID: 18384654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.
Kokko H; Heubel K
Genetica; 2008 Feb; 132(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17619173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Selection against deleterious mutations and the maintenance of biparental sex.
Howard RS
Theor Popul Biol; 1994 Jun; 45(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 8066552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Male mutation bias and possible long-term effects of human activities.
Cotton S; Wedekind C
Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1190-7. PubMed ID: 20507353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female preferences for indicators of male quality.
van Doorn GS; Weissing FJ
Am Nat; 2006 Dec; 168(6):742-57. PubMed ID: 17109317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 'Good-genes' and 'compatible-genes' effects in an Alpine whitefish and the information content of breeding tubercles over the course of the spawning season.
Wedekind C; Evanno G; Urbach D; Jacob A; Müller R
Genetica; 2008 Feb; 132(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 17628755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Both male and female sexual ornaments reflect offspring performance in a fish.
Kekäläinen J; Huuskonen H; Tuomaala M; Kortet R
Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3149-57. PubMed ID: 20629728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius.
Simmons LW; Emlen DJ
J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Male mutation rates and the cost of sex for females.
Redfield RJ
Nature; 1994 May; 369(6476):145-7. PubMed ID: 8177318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sexual selection and maintenance of sex: evidence from comparisons of rates of genomic accumulation of mutations and divergence of sex-related genes in sexual and hermaphroditic species of Caenorhabditis.
Artieri CG; Haerty W; Gupta BP; Singh RS
Mol Biol Evol; 2008 May; 25(5):972-9. PubMed ID: 18281268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sexual selection and condition-dependence.
Johnstone RA; Rands SA; Evans MR
J Evol Biol; 2009 Dec; 22(12):2387-94. PubMed ID: 19874439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sexual selection determines parental care patterns in cichlid fishes.
Gonzalez-Voyer A; Fitzpatrick JL; Kolm N
Evolution; 2008 Aug; 62(8):2015-26. PubMed ID: 18489718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The depletion of genetic variance by sexual selection.
Van Homrigh A; Higgie M; McGuigan K; Blows MW
Curr Biol; 2007 Mar; 17(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 17306541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sexual selection in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus: no good genes?
Rodríguez-Muñoz R; Bretman A; Hadfield JD; Tregenza T
Genetica; 2008 Mar; 132(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 17647083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Runaway sexual selection leads to good genes.
Chandler CH; Ofria C; Dworkin I
Evolution; 2013 Jan; 67(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 23289565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reconciling sexual selection to species recognition: a process-based model of mating decision.
Castellano S; Cermelli P
J Theor Biol; 2006 Oct; 242(3):529-38. PubMed ID: 16712871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
