These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

587 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19210612)

  • 1. Influence of different tightening forces before laser welding to the implant/framework fit.
    da Silveira-Júnior CD; Neves FD; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Prado CJ; Simamoto-Júnior PC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 19210612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An alternative section method for casting and posterior laser welding of metallic frameworks for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    de Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Rodrigues RC; Mattos Mde G; Ribeiro RF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 19141050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the passivity between cast alloy and laser-welded titanium overdenture bars.
    Paiva J; Givan DA; Broome JC; Lemons JE; McCracken MS
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):656-62. PubMed ID: 19682220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implant abutment deformation during prosthetic cylinder screw tightening: an in vitro study.
    Neto RT; Moura MS; Souza EA; Rubo JH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 19639078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro investigation of marginal accuracy of implant-supported screw-retained partial dentures.
    Koke U; Wolf A; Lenz P; Gilde H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 May; 31(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 15140174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the effect of retightening and mechanical cycling on preload maintenance of retention screws.
    Delben JA; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 21483877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.
    Smith NA; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 24656409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the stress generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Kim CW; Kim MJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1045-53. PubMed ID: 20162108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.
    Tan BF; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):648-58. PubMed ID: 15508980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
    Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deformation of implant abutments after framework connection using strain gauges.
    Hollweg H; Jacques LB; da Silva Moura M; Bianco VC; Souza EA; Rubo JH
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 22568468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis.
    Watanabe F; Uno I; Hata Y; Neuendorff G; Kirsch A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 10795453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
    Goossens IC; Herbst D
    SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative analysis of the fit of 3-unit implant-supported frameworks cast in nickel-chromium and cobalt-chromium alloys and commercially pure titanium after casting, laser welding, and simulated porcelain firings.
    Tiossi R; Rodrigues RC; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 18546764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
    Martin WC; Woody RD; Miller BH; Miller AW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.
    Lee J; Kim YS; Kim CW; Han JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 12447217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.