These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19210768)

  • 1. Mega-phylogeny approach for comparative biology: an alternative to supertree and supermatrix approaches.
    Smith SA; Beaulieu JM; Donoghue MJ
    BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Feb; 9():37. PubMed ID: 19210768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of HGT on phylogenomic reconstruction methods.
    Lapierre P; Lasek-Nesselquist E; Gogarten JP
    Brief Bioinform; 2014 Jan; 15(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 22908214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phylogenetic supermatrix analysis of GenBank sequences from 2228 papilionoid legumes.
    McMahon MM; Sanderson MJ
    Syst Biol; 2006 Oct; 55(5):818-36. PubMed ID: 17060202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The challenge of constructing large phylogenetic trees.
    Sanderson MJ; Driskell AC
    Trends Plant Sci; 2003 Aug; 8(8):374-9. PubMed ID: 12927970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inferring the mammal tree: Species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation.
    Upham NS; Esselstyn JA; Jetz W
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Dec; 17(12):e3000494. PubMed ID: 31800571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sparse supermatrices for phylogenetic inference: taxonomy, alignment, rogue taxa, and the phylogeny of living turtles.
    Thomson RC; Shaffer HB
    Syst Biol; 2010 Jan; 59(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 20525619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Invariant transformers of Robinson and Foulds distance matrices for Convolutional Neural Network.
    Tahiri N; Veriga A; Koshkarov A; Morozov B
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2022 Aug; 20(4):2250012. PubMed ID: 35798684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Complete generic-level phylogenetic analyses of palms (Arecaceae) with comparisons of supertree and supermatrix approaches.
    Baker WJ; Savolainen V; Asmussen-Lange CB; Chase MW; Dransfield J; Forest F; Harley MM; Uhl NW; Wilkinson M
    Syst Biol; 2009 Apr; 58(2):240-56. PubMed ID: 20525581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bad Clade Deletion Supertrees: A Fast and Accurate Supertree Algorithm.
    Fleischauer M; Böcker S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Sep; 34(9):2408-2421. PubMed ID: 28873954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.
    Tamura K; Peterson D; Peterson N; Stecher G; Nei M; Kumar S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Oct; 28(10):2731-9. PubMed ID: 21546353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A likelihood look at the supermatrix-supertree controversy.
    Ren F; Tanaka H; Yang Z
    Gene; 2009 Jul; 441(1-2):119-25. PubMed ID: 18502054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SuperFine: fast and accurate supertree estimation.
    Swenson MS; Suri R; Linder CR; Warnow T
    Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 21934137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shortest triplet clustering: reconstructing large phylogenies using representative sets.
    Vinh le S; von Haeseler A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():92. PubMed ID: 15819989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genome BLAST distance phylogenies inferred from whole plastid and whole mitochondrion genome sequences.
    Auch AF; Henz SR; Holland BR; Göker M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 7():350. PubMed ID: 16854218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
    Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient algorithms for knowledge-enhanced supertree and supermatrix phylogenetic problems.
    Wehe A; Burleigh JG; Eulenstein O
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(6):1432-41. PubMed ID: 24407302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The tree of genomes: an empirical comparison of genome-phylogeny reconstruction methods.
    McCann A; Cotton JA; McInerney JO
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 8():312. PubMed ID: 19014489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phylogeny and divergence of the pinnipeds (Carnivora: Mammalia) assessed using a multigene dataset.
    Higdon JW; Bininda-Emonds OR; Beck RM; Ferguson SH
    BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 7():216. PubMed ID: 17996107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative performance of supertree algorithms in large data sets using the soapberry family (Sapindaceae) as a case study.
    Buerki S; Forest F; Salamin N; Alvarez N
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jan; 60(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 21068445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.