205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19212179)
21. Surgeon and hospital characteristics as predictors of major adverse outcomes following colon cancer surgery: understanding the volume-outcome relationship.
Billingsley KG; Morris AM; Dominitz JA; Matthews B; Dobie S; Barlow W; Wright GE; Baldwin LM
Arch Surg; 2007 Jan; 142(1):23-31; discussion 32. PubMed ID: 17224497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Surgeon volume does not predict outcomes in the setting of technical credentialing: results from a randomized trial in colon cancer.
Larson DW; Marcello PW; Larach SW; Wexner SD; Park A; Marks J; Senagore AJ; Thorson AG; Young-Fadok TM; Green E; Sargent DJ; Nelson H
Ann Surg; 2008 Nov; 248(5):746-50. PubMed ID: 18948801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Surgical specialty, surgical unit volume and mortality after oesophageal cancer surgery.
Leigh Y; Goldacre M; McCulloch P
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Aug; 35(8):820-5. PubMed ID: 19195816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Postoperative complications after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction are correlated with early cancer recurrence: role of systematic grading of complications using the modified Clavien classification.
Lerut T; Moons J; Coosemans W; Van Raemdonck D; De Leyn P; Decaluwé H; Decker G; Nafteux P
Ann Surg; 2009 Nov; 250(5):798-807. PubMed ID: 19809297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The more the better?: the impact of surgeon and hospital volume on in-hospital mortality following colorectal resection.
Karanicolas PJ; Dubois L; Colquhoun PH; Swallow CJ; Walter SD; Guyatt GH
Ann Surg; 2009 Jun; 249(6):954-9. PubMed ID: 19474684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of surgeon and hospital volume on 5-year survival rates following oral cancer resections: the experience of an Asian country.
Lin CC; Lin HC
Surgery; 2008 Mar; 143(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 18291255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of surgeon volume and specialization on short-term outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery.
Borowski DW; Kelly SB; Bradburn DM; Wilson RG; Gunn A; Ratcliffe AA;
Br J Surg; 2007 Jul; 94(7):880-9. PubMed ID: 17410637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relationship between provider volume and postoperative complications for bariatric procedures in New York State.
Weller WE; Hannan EL
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 May; 202(5):753-61. PubMed ID: 16648015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. University hospital status and surgeon volume and risk of reoperation following surgery for esophageal cancer.
Kauppila JH; Wahlin K; Lagergren P; Lagergren J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 May; 44(5):632-637. PubMed ID: 29548804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predictors of postoperative quality of life after esophagectomy for cancer.
Djärv T; Blazeby JM; Lagergren P
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Apr; 27(12):1963-8. PubMed ID: 19289614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Association between surgeon and hospital volume and in-hospital fatalities after lung cancer resections: the experience of an Asian country.
Lien YC; Huang MT; Lin HC
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1837-43. PubMed ID: 17462409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Differences in reported esophageal cancer resection outcomes between national clinical and administrative databases.
Lapar DJ; Stukenborg GJ; Lau CL; Jones DR; Kozower BD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1152-7. PubMed ID: 22938777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a case-control study.
Jestin P; Påhlman L; Gunnarsson U
Colorectal Dis; 2008 Sep; 10(7):715-21. PubMed ID: 18318752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Association of age and survival in patients with gastroesophageal cancer undergoing surgery with or without preoperative therapy.
Braiteh F; Correa AM; Hofstetter WL; Rice DC; Vaporciyan AA; Walsh GL; Roth JA; Mehran RJ; Swisher SG; Ajani JA
Cancer; 2009 Oct; 115(19):4450-8. PubMed ID: 19562780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Disparities in the classification of esophageal and cardia adenocarcinomas and their influence on reported incidence rates.
Lindblad M; Ye W; Lindgren A; Lagergren J
Ann Surg; 2006 Apr; 243(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 16552198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Are leukocytes and CRP early indicators for anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection?].
Deitmar S; Anthoni C; Palmes D; Haier J; Senninger N; Brüwer M
Zentralbl Chir; 2009 Feb; 134(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 19242888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Analysis of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leaks after transhiatal esophagectomy: risk factors, presentation, and detection.
Cooke DT; Lin GC; Lau CL; Zhang L; Si MS; Lee J; Chang AC; Pickens A; Orringer MB
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 88(1):177-84; discussion 184-5. PubMed ID: 19559221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of surgeon and hospital volumes on short-term postoperative complications after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Yasunaga H; Nishii O; Hirai Y; Ochiai K; Matsuyama Y; Ohe K
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Aug; 35(4):699-705. PubMed ID: 19751330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Randomized trials and registries: a computer simulation to study the impact of surgeon/patient factors on outcomes.
Weiner BK; Patel R; Noble P
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):959-67. PubMed ID: 18243058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Hospital volume, surgeon volume, and patient costs for cancer surgery.
Ho V; Aloia T
Med Care; 2008 Jul; 46(7):718-25. PubMed ID: 18580391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
