BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19212881)

  • 1. Asymptotic simultaneous confidence intervals for many-to-one comparisons of binary proportions in randomized clinical trials.
    Schaarschmidt F; Biesheuvel E; Hothorn LA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):292-310. PubMed ID: 19212881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sequential urn designs with elimination for comparing K > or =3 treatments.
    Coad DS; Ivanova A
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):1995-2009. PubMed ID: 15803441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Approximate simultaneous confidence intervals for multiple contrasts of binomial proportions.
    Schaarschmidt F; Sill M; Hothorn LA
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):782-92. PubMed ID: 18932137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.
    Tang ML; Tang NS; Chan IS
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3565-79. PubMed ID: 16261646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion difference in medical studies with bilateral data.
    Tang NS; Qiu SF; Tang ML; Pei YB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):233-59. PubMed ID: 20181778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The analysis of continuous outcomes in multi-centre trials with small centre sizes.
    Pickering RM; Weatherall M
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5445-56. PubMed ID: 17924360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re: Randomized controlled trial of resection versus radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy in stage IIIA-N2 non small-cell lung cancer.
    Leo F; De Pas T; Catalano G; Piperno G; Curigliano G; Solli P; Veronesi G; Petrella F; Spaggiari L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1210; author reply 1210-1. PubMed ID: 17652281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to deal with multiple treatment or dose groups in randomized clinical trials?
    Hothorn LA
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):137-54. PubMed ID: 17391286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple alternative confidence interval for the difference between two proportions.
    Zou G; Donner A
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Feb; 25(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 14980745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
    Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size for testing difference between two proportions for the bilateral-sample design.
    Qiu SF; Tang NS; Tang ML; Pei YB
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):857-71. PubMed ID: 20183448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two new covariate adjustment methods for non-inferiority assessment of binary clinical trials data.
    Hou Y; Ding V; Li K; Zhou XH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 21191856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple comparisons and multiple contrasts in randomized dose-response trials--confidence interval oriented approaches.
    Hothorn LA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(5):711-31. PubMed ID: 17037267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of the bootstrap in analysing cost data from cluster randomised trials: some simulation results.
    Flynn TN; Peters TJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):33. PubMed ID: 15550169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of amifostine on response rates in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated on randomized controlled trials: a meta-analysis.
    Mell LK; Malik R; Komaki R; Movsas B; Swann RS; Langer C; Antonadou D; Koukourakis M; Mundt AJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 May; 68(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 17289291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size determination for comparing several survival curves with unequal allocations.
    Halabi S; Singh B
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1793-815. PubMed ID: 15160409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power and sample size simulations for Randomized Play-the-Winner rules.
    Guimaraes P; Palesch Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):487-99. PubMed ID: 17321219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving small-sample inference in group randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM; Braun TM
    Stat Med; 2011 Feb; 30(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 21213338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test for the consistency of noninferiority from multiple clinical trials.
    Yan X; Wang MC; Su X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 17365223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-arm noninferiority trials with a prespecified margin for inference of the difference in the proportions of binary endpoints.
    Hida E; Tango T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(4):774-89. PubMed ID: 23799810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.