These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19212885)

  • 1. Assessment of individual agreements with repeated measurements based on generalized confidence intervals.
    Quiroz J; Burdick RK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 19212885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of equivalence using a concordance correlation coefficient in a repeated measurements design.
    Quiroz J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):913-28. PubMed ID: 16279351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing equivalence of two assays using sensitivity and specificity.
    Quiroz J; Burdick RK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 17479392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of individual and population bioequivalence using the probability that bioavailabilities are similar.
    Schall R
    Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):615-26. PubMed ID: 7662849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alternative confidence intervals for the assessment of bioequivalence in four-period cross-over designs.
    Quiroz J; Ting N; Wei GC; Burdick RK
    Stat Med; 2002 Jul; 21(13):1825-47. PubMed ID: 12111892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A modified large sample approach in the assessment of population bioequivalence.
    Quiroz J; Ting N; Wei GC; Burdick RK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 Nov; 10(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 11104391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Error bounds for data-driven models of dynamical systems.
    Oleng' NO; Gribok A; Reifman J
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 May; 37(5):670-9. PubMed ID: 16895726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of risks by predicting counterfactuals.
    Zou GY
    Stat Med; 2009 Dec; 28(30):3761-81. PubMed ID: 19856279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-sided tolerance intervals for balanced and unbalanced random effects models.
    Hoffman D; Kringle R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(2):283-93. PubMed ID: 15796296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The concordance correlation coefficient for repeated measures estimated by variance components.
    Carrasco JL; King TS; Chinchilli VM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(1):90-105. PubMed ID: 19127469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correction for covariate measurement error in generalized linear models--a bootstrap approach.
    Haukka JK
    Biometrics; 1995 Sep; 51(3):1127-32. PubMed ID: 7548695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constructing bootstrap confidence intervals for principal component loadings in the presence of missing data: a multiple-imputation approach.
    van Ginkel JR; Kiers HA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):498-515. PubMed ID: 21973098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two confidence interval approaches on the dependability coefficient in a two-factor crossed design.
    Ting N; Cappelleri JC; Bushmakin AG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Jul; 19(4):610-24. PubMed ID: 20183429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlations corrected for indirect range restriction.
    Li JC; Chan W; Cui Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):367-87. PubMed ID: 21973092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confidence intervals for ratios of AUCs in the case of serial sampling: a comparison of seven methods.
    Jaki T; Wolfsegger MJ; Ploner M
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(1):12-24. PubMed ID: 18407562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An alternative approach to assess exchangeability of a test treatment and the standard treatment with normally distributed response.
    Tsong Y; Shen M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):329-38. PubMed ID: 17365227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interval estimation for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve when data are subject to error.
    Li Y; Koval JJ; Donner A; Zou GY
    Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2521-31. PubMed ID: 20684006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inferences on the mean response in a log-regression model: the generalized variable approach.
    Tian L; Wu J
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5180-8. PubMed ID: 17476648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonparametric confidence intervals for Tmax in sequence-stratified crossover studies.
    Willavize SA; Morgenthien EA
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 17256803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.