These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

43 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19213586)

  • 1. Durability of imaging plates in clinical use.
    van Langen H; Castelijn T
    Phys Med; 2009 Dec; 25(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 19213586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognition and prevention of computed radiography image artifacts.
    Hammerstrom K; Aldrich J; Alves L; Ho A
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):226-39. PubMed ID: 16710796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linearity and uniformity response as an indicator of performance for Agfa ADC-MD10 computed radiography plates.
    Zullo JR; Bloch C; Chi PC; Kudchadker R
    Med Dosim; 2004; 29(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 15191759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [New computed radiography technologies in digital radiography].
    Fasbender R; Schaetzing R
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 12764585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The physical aspects of traditional radiology and of computed radiology compared].
    Bacarini L; Giacomich R; Saccavini C
    Radiol Med; 1995 Apr; 89(4):506-19. PubMed ID: 7597234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed radiography: photostimulable phosphor image plate technology.
    Long BW
    Radiol Technol; 1989; 61(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 2587727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Storage phosphor plates: how durable are they as a digital dental radiographic system?
    Bedard A; Davis TD; Angelopoulos C
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 May; 5(2):57-69. PubMed ID: 15150634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of digital fluorographs ProScan-2000 and ProMatrix-4000].
    Gurhiev AN; Gurzhiev SN; Kirichenko MG; Kostritskiĭ AV
    Med Tekh; 2005; (5):45-8. PubMed ID: 16285249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Chest radiography: ROC phantom study of four different digital systems and one conventional radiographic system].
    Redlich U; Reissberg S; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 12525979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intrinsic uniformity requirements for pinhole SPECT.
    Seret A; Bleeser F
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2006 Mar; 34(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 16517968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exposure indicator degradation from CR plate processing delays.
    Kowalczyk N; Comer E
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):401-9. PubMed ID: 19457844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A clinical trial of the Nomad portable X-ray unit.
    Brooks SL; McMinn WE; Benavides E
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 91(2):54-8. PubMed ID: 19288662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems.
    Båth M; Håkansson M; Tingberg A; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):253-9. PubMed ID: 15933117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
    Fauber TL
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimisation strategies introduced for CR at health care centres in Estonia.
    Kepler K; Vladimirov A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):127-31. PubMed ID: 18252852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.