208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19213884)
21. Evaluation of the NITV CVSA.
Hollien H; Harnsberger JD; Martin CA; Hollien KA
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 18279255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Distinguishing between forensic science and forensic pseudoscience: testing of validity and reliability, and approaches to forensic voice comparison.
Morrison GS
Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 24796954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Introduction to forensic science.
Lehman DC
Clin Lab Sci; 2012; 25(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 22693780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. E-schemes and E-scams: what investors should know about Internet investment fraud.
Cilwik CJ
J Dent Technol; 2000 Mar; 17(2):25-6. PubMed ID: 11323881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Retraction notice.
Shafer SL
Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1351. PubMed ID: 19299814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Commentary on: Bohan TL. President's editorial--Strengthening forensic science: a way station on the journey to justice.
Sapir JD
J Forensic Sci; 2010 Sep; 55(5):1397. PubMed ID: 21050206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models to calculate a likelihood ratio for a Chinese forensic voice comparison case involving two sisters.
Zhang C; Morrison GS; Enzinger E
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():115-124. PubMed ID: 27592142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. EAFS 2012 6th European Academy of Forensic Science Conference The Hague, 20-24 August 2012. Introduction.
Meuwly D
Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):1. PubMed ID: 23643403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. "Comment on a retraction": author response.
Roblin X; Peyrin-Biroulet L; Phélip JM; Nancey S; Flourié B
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jul; 104(7):1864-5. PubMed ID: 19574985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Forensic voice comparison and the paradigm shift.
Morrison GS
Sci Justice; 2009 Dec; 49(4):298-308. PubMed ID: 20120610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Journal retracts article about age of transfused blood three years after publication.
Lenzer J
BMJ; 2009 May; 338():b2057. PubMed ID: 19457953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Journal’s withdrawal of article. Concerns about methods used.
Goldstein BJ
BMJ; 2011 May; 342():d2722. PubMed ID: 21558337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Medscape.
Stiles L
J Forensic Nurs; 2006; 2(1):41. PubMed ID: 17076006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Universite de Montréal in the dark about fraud.
Kondro W
CMAJ; 2005 May; 172(10):1278. PubMed ID: 15883394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record.
Hoppeler H; Handel M; Moulton OC
J Exp Biol; 2008 Dec; 211(Pt 23):3651. PubMed ID: 19011202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The International Endodontic Journal--a contemporary publication.
Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1025. PubMed ID: 19133092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems.
Morrison GS
Sci Justice; 2011 Sep; 51(3):91-8. PubMed ID: 21889105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. NEJM retracts HIV heart paper.
Bonetta L
Nat Med; 2002 Aug; 8(8):770. PubMed ID: 12152019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Error and its meaning in forensic science.
Christensen AM; Crowder CM; Ousley SD; Houck MM
J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):123-6. PubMed ID: 24111751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
