These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1921528)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness and obstetric services.
    Finkler MD; Wirtschafter DD
    Med Care; 1991 Oct; 29(10):951-63. PubMed ID: 1921528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One health maintenance organization's experience: obstetric costs depend more on staffing patterns than on mode of delivery.
    Finkler MD; Wirtschafter DD
    J Perinatol; 1997; 17(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 9134516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why pay extra for cesarean-section deliveries?
    Finkler MD; Wirtschafter DD
    Inquiry; 1993; 30(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 8314609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cesarean decision in New York State, 1986. Economic and noneconomic aspects.
    Tussing AD; Wojtowycz MA
    Med Care; 1992 Jun; 30(6):529-40. PubMed ID: 1593918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical outcomes and maternal perceptions of an updated model of perinatal care.
    Lieu TA; Wikler C; Capra AM; Martin KE; Escobar GJ; Braveman PA
    Pediatrics; 1998 Dec; 102(6):1437-44. PubMed ID: 9832582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physician cesarean delivery rates and risk-adjusted perinatal outcomes.
    Li T; Rhoads GG; Smulian J; Demissie K; Wartenberg D; Kruse L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 101(6):1204-12. PubMed ID: 12798526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of primary cesarean section rates: need, validity and parsimony.
    Fantini MP; Stivanello E; Frammartino B; Barone AP; Fusco D; Dallolio L; Cacciari P; Perucci CA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Aug; 6():100. PubMed ID: 16911770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linking health outcomes and resource efficiency for hospitalized patients: do physicians with low mortality and morbidity rates also have low resource expenditures?
    Bradbury RC; Golec JH; Steen PM
    Health Serv Manage Res; 2000 Feb; 13(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 11184006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates.
    Bailit JL; Dooley SL; Peaceman AN
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 93(6):1025-30. PubMed ID: 10362175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physician incentives and the timing of cesarean sections: evidence from California.
    Spetz J; Smith MW; Ennis SF
    Med Care; 2001 Jun; 39(6):536-50. PubMed ID: 11404639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Charges for comprehensive obstetric care at teaching and nonteaching hospitals. A comparison.
    Gordon GS; Sefcik SE; Lo Gerfo JP
    West J Med; 1991 Dec; 155(6):616-20. PubMed ID: 1812631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lowering the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: comparison of individual physicians' rates, risk factors, and outcomes.
    Lagrew DC; Adashek JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1207-14. PubMed ID: 9662303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health maintenance organizations, independent practice associations, and cesarean section rates.
    Tussing AD; Wojtowycz MA
    Health Serv Res; 1994 Apr; 29(1):75-93. PubMed ID: 8163381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section.
    Stafford RS
    JAMA; 1991 Jan; 265(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 1984126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The medical and economic impact of the Newborns' and Mothers' Health Protection Act.
    Mosen DM; Clark SL; Mundorff MB; Tracy DM; McKnight EC; Zollo MB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jan; 99(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 11777521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The labor-adjusted cesarean section rate--a more informative method than the cesarean section "rate" for assessing a practitioner's labor and delivery skills.
    Elliott JP; Russell MM; Dickason LA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 177(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 9240597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues.
    Kozhimannil KB; Law MR; Virnig BA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Mar; 32(3):527-35. PubMed ID: 23459732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the effects of variation in clinical practice: a risk adjusted cost-effectiveness (RAC-E) analysis of acute stroke services.
    Pham C; Caffrey O; Ben-Tovim D; Hakendorf P; Crotty M; Karnon J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Aug; 12():266. PubMed ID: 22905669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of physician factors on the cesarean section decision.
    Burns LR; Geller SE; Wholey DR
    Med Care; 1995 Apr; 33(4):365-82. PubMed ID: 7731278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variations in the use of cesarean delivery for dystocia: lessons about the source of care.
    McCloskey L; Petitti DB; Hobel CJ
    Med Care; 1992 Feb; 30(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 1736018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.