267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19215560)
1. Preoperative evaluation and triage of women with suspicious adnexal masses using risk of malignancy index.
Enakpene CA; Omigbodun AO; Goecke TW; Odukogbe AT; Beckmann MW
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 19215560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Triage of ovarian masses.
Chia YN; Marsden DE; Robertson G; Hacker NF
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jun; 48(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 18532966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of adnexal masses.
Leng JH; Lang JH; Zhang JJ; Feng FZ; Liu ZF; Sun DW; Zhu L; Zhao XY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Feb; 119(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 16537005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of risk of malignancy index (RMI), CA125, CA 19-9, ultrasound score, and menopausal status in borderline ovarian tumor.
Alanbay I; Akturk E; Coksuer H; Ercan M; Karaşahin E; Dede M; Yenen MC; Ozan H; Baser I
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2012 Jun; 28(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 22122561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An improved risk of malignancy index in diagnosis of adnexal mass.
Wang LM; Song H; Song X; Zhou XB
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Feb; 125(3):533-5. PubMed ID: 22490416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective study to evaluate the risk malignancy index and its diagnostic implication in patients with suspected ovarian mass.
Dora SK; Dandapat AB; Pande B; Hota JP
J Ovarian Res; 2017 Aug; 10(1):55. PubMed ID: 28806987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved Detection Rate of Ovarian Cancer Using a 2-Step Triage Model of the Risk of Malignancy Index and Expert Sonography in an Outpatient Screening Setting.
Manegold-Brauer G; Buechel J; Knipprath-Mészaros A; Schoetzau A; Hacker NF; Tercanli S; Lapaire O; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jul; 26(6):1062-9. PubMed ID: 27177281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic diagnosis of adnexal cystic masses: a 12-year experience with long-term follow-up.
Canis M; Mage G; Pouly JL; Wattiez A; Manhes H; Bruhat MA
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 83(5 Pt 1):707-12. PubMed ID: 8164928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ovarian malignancy in breast cancer patients with an adnexal mass.
Simpkins F; Zahurak M; Armstrong D; Grumbine F; Bristow R
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):507-13. PubMed ID: 15738016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses.
Ulusoy S; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulusoy N; Odabas E; Gulkilik A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Mar; 96(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 17280665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unilocular adnexal cysts with papillary projections but no other solid components: is there a diagnostic method that can classify them reliably as benign or malignant before surgery?
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):570-81. PubMed ID: 22915541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance evaluation of adnexal masses.
Guerra A; Cunha TM; Félix A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):700-9. PubMed ID: 18568564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should cut-off values of the risk of malignancy index be changed for evaluation of adnexal masses in Asian and Pacific populations?
Yavuzcan A; Caglar M; Ozgu E; Ustun Y; Dilbaz S; Ozdemir I; Yildiz E; Gungor T; Kumru S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(9):5455-9. PubMed ID: 24175841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the risk malignancy index diagnostic value in patients with adnexal masses.
Terzić M; Dotlić J; Ladjević IL; Atanacković J; Ladjević N
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2011 Jul; 68(7):589-93. PubMed ID: 21899180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) in the diagnosis of ovarian malignancy.
Padungsutt P; Thirapagawong C; Senapad S; Suphanit I
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(2B):1291-5. PubMed ID: 10810437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of malignancy index in preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses.
Ashrafgangooei T; Rezaeezadeh M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1727-30. PubMed ID: 22126553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inclusion of CA-125 does not improve mathematical models developed to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal tumors.
Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Jurkovic D; Valentin L; Testa AC; Bernard JP; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Vergote I; Bourne T
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Sep; 25(27):4194-200. PubMed ID: 17698805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonographic accuracy in the diagnosis of ovarian masses.
Benacerraf BR; Finkler NJ; Wojciechowski C; Knapp RC
J Reprod Med; 1990 May; 35(5):491-5. PubMed ID: 2191131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Serum CA-125 in relation to adnexal dysplasia and cancer in women at hereditary high risk of ovarian cancer.
Hermsen BB; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Berkhof J; van Diest PJ; Gille JJ; Menko FH; Blankenstein MA; Kenemans P; Verheijen RH
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Apr; 25(11):1383-9. PubMed ID: 17416858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different strategies to triage women with adnexal masses: a prospective study.
Piovano E; Cavallero C; Fuso L; Viora E; Ferrero A; Gregori G; Grillo C; Macchi C; Mengozzi G; Mitidieri M; Pagano E; Zola P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 50(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 27706929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
