188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19215745)
21. Amalgam and composite posterior restorations: curriculum versus practice in operative dentistry at a US dental school.
Ottenga ME; Mjör I
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):524-8. PubMed ID: 17910231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The amalgam-free dental school.
Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Loomans BA
J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):371-7. PubMed ID: 15193785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evidence summary: which dental liners under amalgam restorations are more effective in reducing postoperative sensitivity?
Nasser M
Br Dent J; 2011 Jun; 210(11):533-7. PubMed ID: 21660022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations.
Sarrett DC
Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 15680997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Amalgam--Resurrection and redemption. Part 1: the clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam.
Wahl MJ
Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(7):525-35. PubMed ID: 11495565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part II. Comparisons between composite and alloy restorations.
Full CA; Hollander WR
ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8432948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: one-year results.
Wilson MA; Cowan AJ; Randall RC; Crisp RJ; Wilson NH
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 12216558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Re-treatment decisions for failed posterior fillings by Finnish general practitioners.
Heinikainen M; Vehkalahti M; Murtomaa H
Community Dent Health; 2002 Jun; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 12146589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars.
García-Godoy F
Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 44(3):541-70. PubMed ID: 10925772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Teaching of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Brazilian dental schools.
Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Veiga Filho LC; Ritter AV
Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(10):735-40. PubMed ID: 11204001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
Jagadish S; Yogesh BG
Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Time required for placement of composite versus amalgam restorations.
Dilley DC; Vann WF; Oldenburg TR; Crisp RM
ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 2345211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of wear and clinical performance between amalgam, composite and open sandwich restorations: 2-year results.
Sachdeo A; Gray GB; Sulieman MA; Jagger DC
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 15058177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Survival analysis of posterior restorations using an insurance claims database.
Bogacki RE; Hunt RJ; del Aguila M; Smith WR
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 12216568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques.
El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH
J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Composite resin-amalgam compound restorations.
Franchi M; Trisi P; Montanari G; Piattelli A
Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):577-82. PubMed ID: 7568708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement, and longevity of restorations in Florida.
Mjör IA; Moorhead JE
J Am Coll Dent; 1998; 65(3):27-33. PubMed ID: 9805435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evidence-based review of clinical studies on restorative dentistry.
J Endod; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1111-5. PubMed ID: 19631844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
