BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19215880)

  • 1. Validation of software for calculating the likelihood ratio for parentage and kinship.
    Drábek J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Mar; 3(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 19215880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.
    Phillips C; Fondevila M; García-Magariños M; Rodriguez A; Salas A; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 19083821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [DNAStat, version 1.0--a software package for processing a genetic profile database and for biostatistical calculations].
    Berent J
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2006; 56(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 16708610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of DNA-based identification software by computation of pedigree likelihood ratios.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 20727843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ISFG: Recommendations on biostatistics in paternity testing.
    Gjertson DW; Brenner CH; Baur MP; Carracedo A; Guidet F; Luque JA; Lessig R; Mayr WR; Pascali VL; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Dec; 1(3-4):223-31. PubMed ID: 19083766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kinship testing with X-chromosomal markers: mathematical and statistical issues.
    Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19083739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Spreadsheets of a conventional application software for calculation of plausibility of paternity: application to parentage testing with highly polymorphic markers in deceased party].
    Aoki Y; Hashiyada M; Morioka A; Nata M; Sagisaka K
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1997 Jun; 51(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 9301224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structured incorporation of prior information in relationship identification problems.
    Sheehan NA; Egeland T
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Jul; 71(Pt 4):501-18. PubMed ID: 17233753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Familias 3 - Extensions and new functionality.
    Kling D; Tillmar AO; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():121-7. PubMed ID: 25113576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A statistical treatment of biases affecting the estimation of mutation rates.
    Vicard P; Dawid AP
    Mutat Res; 2004 Mar; 547(1-2):19-33. PubMed ID: 15013695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On statistical analysis of forensic DNA: theory, methods and computer programs.
    Fung WK; Hu YQ; Chung YK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Oct; 162(1-3):17-23. PubMed ID: 16870375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of extended kinship analyses utilizing commercial STR kit in establishing personal identification.
    Yoshida K; Yayama K; Hatanaka A; Tamaki K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2011 Jan; 13(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 20952240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. User-friendly programs for easy calculations in paternity testing and kinship determinations.
    Fung WK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2003 Sep; 136(1-3):22-34. PubMed ID: 12969617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ForeStatistics: A windows-based feature-rich software program for performing statistics in forensic DNA analysis, paternity and relationship testing.
    Rasool N; Hussain W
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Feb; 307():110142. PubMed ID: 31927396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resolving paternity relationships using X-chromosome STRs and Bayesian networks.
    Hatsch D; Keyser C; Hienne R; Bertrand L
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):895-7. PubMed ID: 17553082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Universal algoritihms for paternity index in trios and its extended application].
    Que TZ; Zhang SH; Zhao SM
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 27(5):334-6. PubMed ID: 22259858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Methods of expressing the strength of expert proof of paternity determination].
    Drábek J
    Cas Lek Cesk; 2002 Jun; 141(12):371-5. PubMed ID: 12238022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpretation and statistical evaluation of multilocus DNA fingerprints in paternity and relationship testing.
    Rysiecki G; Brookfield JF
    Methods Mol Biol; 1998; 98():97-103. PubMed ID: 9664558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [DNAStat, version 1.2 -- a software package for processing genetic profile databases and biostatistical calculations].
    Berent J
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 17907628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Paternity testing. 2: Likelihood ratio tests.
    Kaiser L; Seber GA
    Am J Med Genet; 1985 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 3976716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.