These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1921604)
1. [The Supreme Court overturned the verdict against physicians in a case on a patient's informed consent]. Löwdahl KK Lakartidningen; 1991 Sep; 88(39):3154-9. PubMed ID: 1921604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Informed consent and the disclosure of risks of treatment: the Supreme Court of Canada decides. Dillon JR Bioethics Q; 1981; 3(3-4):156-62. PubMed ID: 11649479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. California Supreme Court expands the informed consent doctine; physicians have a duty to obtain an informed refusal: Truman v. Thomas. Cluff CA Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):933-47. PubMed ID: 11655722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Distinguishing negligence from intentional tort when a health care provider deviates from a patient's consent. Cole CA; Holtz MD Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(2):45-53. PubMed ID: 10124484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Legal obligation of physicians to disclose information to patients. Chafe SM CMAJ; 1991 Mar; 144(6):681-5. PubMed ID: 1998927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent. Penhallegon JR Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The minor's right to consent to medical treatment: a corollary of the constitutional right of privacy. Raitt GE South Calif Law Rev; 1975 Jun; 48(6):1417-56. PubMed ID: 11664463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hummel v. Reiss: the New Jersey Supreme Court takes a step backward in its recognition of wrongful life. Barrett TA Rutgers Law Rev; 1993; 46(1):535-63. PubMed ID: 11652806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The anatomy of the judicial process: the Supreme Court is not out to destroy the medical profession. Kelleher TF R I Med J (1974); 1975 Feb; 58(2):56-61, 66-7. PubMed ID: 124081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent: does the First Amendment protect a patient's right to choose alternative treatment? Karpman A N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 2000; 16(3):933-57. PubMed ID: 12645595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How to lose informed consent. Roper RR Appl Radiol; 1989 Apr; 18(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 10294837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physicians and surgeons--malpractice--informed consent of patient: duty to inform patient to be established by expert medical testimony. Wash Law Rev; 1973 May; 48(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 11664248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent and malpractice jeopardy: practical aspects. Alsobrook HB Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(3):ORL277-81. PubMed ID: 11664753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protecting patient-doctor discourse: informed consent and deliberative autonomy. Gatter KM Oregon Law Rev; 1999; 78(4):941-93. PubMed ID: 12666672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Need to inform the patient and required supervision regarding novice physicians performing surgical interventions]. Uhlenbruck W Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1981 Nov; 106(48):1630-2. PubMed ID: 7308004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The abortion alternative and the patient's right to know. Shapiro SC Wash Univ Law Q; 1978; 1978(1):167-210. PubMed ID: 11664983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Big abortion: what the antiabortion movement can learn from big tobacco. Heminger JD Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2005; 54(4):1273-311. PubMed ID: 17115504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]