These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19216271)

  • 1. A comparison of fabrication precision and mechanical reliability of 2 zirconia implant abutments.
    Kerstein RB; Radke J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1029-36. PubMed ID: 19216271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments.
    Kim S; Kim HI; Brewer JD; Monaco EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 19328275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
    Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The implant-abutment interface of alumina and zirconia abutments.
    Yüzügüllü B; Avci M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 18218054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights.
    Abbo B; Razzoog ME; Vivas J; Sierraalta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 18182182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wear at the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a pilot study.
    Klotz MW; Taylor TD; Goldberg AJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):970-5. PubMed ID: 22010078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns.
    Ellakwa A; Raj T; Deeb S; Ronaghi G; Martin FE; Klineberg I
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
    Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.
    Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Happe A; Beuer F
    Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1215-20. PubMed ID: 23021964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations.
    Beuer F; Schweiger J; Eichberger M; Kappert HF; Gernet W; Edelhoff D
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18620748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postfatigue fracture resistance of modified prefabricated zirconia implant abutments.
    Alqahtani F; Flinton R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 24461943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs.
    Khraisat A; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):604-10. PubMed ID: 12488853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cement thickness at implant-supported single-tooth Lava assemblies: a scanning electron microscopic investigation.
    Apicella D; Veltri M; Chieffi N; Balleri P; Ferrari M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 20636729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strength of CAD/CAM-generated esthetic ceramic molar implant crowns.
    Wolf D; Bindl A; Schmidlin PR; Lüthy H; Mörmann WH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 18807555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.