2335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19216279)
21. Finite element analysis of an implant-assisted removable partial denture during bilateral loading: occlusal rests position.
Shahmiri R; Das R; Aarts JM; Bennani V
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1126-33. PubMed ID: 24951387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Masticatory function with mandibular implant-supported overdentures fitted with different attachment types.
van der Bilt A; van Kampen FM; Cune MS
Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Jun; 114(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 16776767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of loading positions of mandibular unilateral distal extension removable partial dentures on movements of abutment tooth and denture base.
Jin X; Sato M; Nishiyama A; Ohyama T
J Med Dent Sci; 2004 Sep; 51(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 15597821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The use of extraoral implants for distal-extension removable dentures: a clinical evaluation up to 8 years.
Minoretti R; Triaca A; Saulacic N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1129-37. PubMed ID: 20162119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients.
Rismanchian M; Bajoghli F; Mostajeran Z; Fazel A; Eshkevari Ps
J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 19813425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mandibular implant-supported removable partial denture with distal extension: a systematic review.
de Freitas RF; de Carvalho Dias K; da Fonte Porto Carreiro A; Barbosa GA; Ferreira MA
J Oral Rehabil; 2012 Oct; 39(10):791-8. PubMed ID: 22882547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of implant support on mandibular distal extension removable partial dentures: relationship between denture supporting area and stress distribution.
Sato M; Suzuki Y; Kurihara D; Shimpo H; Ohkubo C
J Prosthodont Res; 2013 Apr; 57(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 23582267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Factors associated with masticatory performance in unilateral distal extension removable partial denture patients.
Tumrasvin W; Fueki K; Ohyama T
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 16433648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible.
Gallucci GO; Doughtie CB; Hwang JW; Fiorellini JP; Weber HP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):601-7. PubMed ID: 19302389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Implant retainers for free-end removable partial dentures affect mastication and nutrient intake.
Campos CH; Gonçalves TM; Rodrigues Garcia RC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):957-61. PubMed ID: 23560748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Masticatory function after unilateral distal extension removable partial denture treatment: intra-individual comparison with opposite dentulous side.
Tumrasvin W; Fueki K; Yanagawa M; Asakawa A; Yoshimura M; Ohyama T
J Med Dent Sci; 2005 Mar; 52(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 15868739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Provisional implants for immediate restoration of partially edentulous jaws: a clinical study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):717-25. PubMed ID: 18807570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Factors related to patients' general satisfaction with removable partial dentures: a stepwise multiple regression analysis.
Zlatarić DK; Celebić A
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 18350954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [A systematic approach for removable partial denture design].
Samet N; Shohat M
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2003 Apr; 20(2):71-6, 83. PubMed ID: 12830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of bone insertion level of support teeth in class I mandibular removable partial denture associated with an osseointegrated implant: a study using finite element analysis.
Verri FR; Pellizzer EP; Pereira JA; Zuim PR; Santiago Júnior JF
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):192-201. PubMed ID: 21613946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Esthetic options for the fabrication of removable partial dentures: a clinical report.
De Rossi A; Albuquerque RF; Bezzon OL
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):465-7. PubMed ID: 11725273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Removable partial denture design and its effect on remaining teeth, based on Hungarian national survey].
Fejérdy P; Borbély J; Schmidt J; Jánh M; Hermann P
Fogorv Sz; 2008 Feb; 101(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 18488739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Placement of a distal implant to convert a mandibular removable Kennedy class I to an implant-supported partial removable Class III dental prosthesis: A systematic review.
Zancopé K; Abrão GM; Karam FK; Neves FD
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):528-33.e3. PubMed ID: 25818673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Detection of improvement in the masticatory function from old to new removable partial dentures using mixing ability test.
Asakawa A; Fueki K; Ohyama T
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):629-34. PubMed ID: 16102074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
