These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19216610)

  • 1. Holographic analysis of the initial canine displacement produced by four different retraction springs.
    Kumar YM; Ravindran NS; Balasubramaniam MR
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):368-72. PubMed ID: 19216610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numerical simulations of canine retraction with T-loop springs based on the updated moment-to-force ratio.
    Kojima Y; Fukui H
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 21135033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The retraction of upper incisors with the PG retraction system.
    Dinçer M; Gülşen A; Türk T
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Feb; 22(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 10721243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anchorage loss during canine retraction using intermittent versus continuous force distractions; a split mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Mowafy MI; Zaher AR
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 23021114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The drum spring (DS) retractor: constant and continuous force for canine retraction.
    Darendeliler MA; Darendeliler H; Uner O
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Apr; 19(2):115-30. PubMed ID: 9183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional canine displacement patterns in response to translation and controlled tipping retraction strategies.
    Li S; Xia Z; Liu SS; Eckert G; Chen J
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 24885592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on the acceleration of tooth movement.
    Showkatbakhsh R; Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh M
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e52-6. PubMed ID: 21490989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics.
    Shpack N; Davidovitch M; Sarne O; Panayi N; Vardimon AD
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Group A T-loop for differential moment mechanics: an implant study.
    Martins RP; Buschang PH; Gandini LG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 19201324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Canine and molar movement, rotation and tipping by NiTi coils versus elastomeric chains in first maxillary premolar extraction orthodontic adolescents: A randomized split-mouth study.
    Hashemzadeh H; Soleimani M; Golbar M; Dehghani Soltani A; Mirmalek SP
    Int Orthod; 2022 Mar; 20(1):100601. PubMed ID: 34866026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Periodontal Changes Adjacent to Extraction Sites during Upper Canine Retraction.
    Al-Jundi A; Sabbagh BA; Baskaradoss JK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb; 18(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 28174364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of rate of canine retraction into recent extraction site with and without gingival fiberotomy: a clinical study.
    Kalra A; Jaggi N; Bansal M; Goel S; Medsinge SV; Abraham R; Jasoria G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):419-26. PubMed ID: 24171983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Hybrid Orthodontic Treatment System (HOTS).
    Ikegami T; Wong RW; Hägg U; Lee W; Hibino K
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(2):168-79. PubMed ID: 20552104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Canine Retraction Using a Closed Nickel Titanium Coil Spring and an Elastic Module.
    Khalid Z; Bangash AA; Anwar A; Pasha H; Amin E
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2018 Sep; 28(9):695-698. PubMed ID: 30158036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of laceback ligatures on maxillary canine retraction.
    Sueri MY; Turk T
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 17090165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comprehensive comparison of canine retraction using NiTi closed coil springs vs elastomeric chains.
    Barsoum HA; ElSayed HS; El Sharaby FA; Palomo JM; Mostafa YA
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Jul; 91(4):441-448. PubMed ID: 34181721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Force generation by orthodontic coil springs.
    von Fraunhofer JA; Bonds PW; Johnson BE
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 8498703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical comparison between nickel titanium springs and elastomeric chains.
    Bokas J; Woods M
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16792244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces.
    Yee JA; Türk T; Elekdağ-Türk S; Cheng LL; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):150.e1-9; discussion 150-1. PubMed ID: 19651334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.