These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19217754)

  • 1. Evaluation of uterine cervix segmentations using ground truth from multiple experts.
    Gordon S; Lotenberg S; Long R; Antani S; Jeronimo J; Greenspan H
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Apr; 33(3):205-16. PubMed ID: 19217754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic detection of anatomical landmarks in uterine cervix images.
    Greenspan H; Gordon S; Zimmerman G; Lotenberg S; Jeronimo J; Antani S; Long R
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Mar; 28(3):454-68. PubMed ID: 19244017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation.
    Warfield SK; Zou KH; Wells WM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):903-21. PubMed ID: 15250643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward objective evaluation of image segmentation algorithms.
    Unnikrishnan R; Pantofaru C; Hebert M
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2007 Jun; 29(6):929-44. PubMed ID: 17431294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance-based classifier combination in atlas-based image segmentation using expectation-maximization parameter estimation.
    Rohlfing T; Russakoff DB; Maurer CR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Aug; 23(8):983-94. PubMed ID: 15338732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Case study: an evaluation of user-assisted hierarchical watershed segmentation.
    Cates JE; Whitaker RT; Jones GM
    Med Image Anal; 2005 Dec; 9(6):566-78. PubMed ID: 15919233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of inferential uncertainty in assessing expert segmentation performance from STAPLE.
    Commowick O; Warfield SK
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2009; 21():701-12. PubMed ID: 19694305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Classification of anatomical structures in MR brain images using fuzzy parameters.
    Algorri ME; Flores-Mangas F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 51(9):1599-608. PubMed ID: 15376508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shape priors for segmentation of the cervix region within uterine cervix images.
    Lotenberg S; Gordon S; Greenspan H
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Jun; 22(3):286-96. PubMed ID: 18704582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simplified labeling process for medical image segmentation.
    Gao M; Huang J; Huang X; Zhang S; Metaxas DN
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 2):387-94. PubMed ID: 23286072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporating priors on expert performance parameters for segmentation validation and label fusion: a maximum a posteriori STAPLE.
    Commowick O; Warfield SK
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2010; 13(Pt 3):25-32. PubMed ID: 20879379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intuitionistic fuzzy segmentation of medical images.
    Chaira T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 57(6):1430-6. PubMed ID: 20172785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of image segmentation by estimating rater bias and variance.
    Warfield SK; Zou KH; Wells WM
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):839-47. PubMed ID: 17354851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Segmentation of nerve fibers using multi-level gradient watershed and fuzzy systems.
    Wang YY; Sun YN; Lin CC; Ju MS
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Mar; 54(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 22239996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Atlas-based segmentation of 3D cerebral structures with competitive level sets and fuzzy control.
    Ciofolo C; Barillot C
    Med Image Anal; 2009 Jun; 13(3):456-70. PubMed ID: 19362876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multispectral MR images segmentation based on fuzzy knowledge and modified seeded region growing.
    Lin GC; Wang WJ; Kang CC; Wang CM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Feb; 30(2):230-46. PubMed ID: 22133286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. VascuSynth: simulating vascular trees for generating volumetric image data with ground-truth segmentation and tree analysis.
    Hamarneh G; Jassi P
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Dec; 34(8):605-16. PubMed ID: 20656456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image segmentation using fuzzy region competition and spatial/frequency information.
    Choy SK; Tang ML; Tong CS
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Jun; 20(6):1473-84. PubMed ID: 21118777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A medical image fusion method based on fuzzy mathematics].
    Li L; Zhang J; Song Z
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Dec; 22(6):1085-9. PubMed ID: 16422072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is STAPLE algorithm confident to assess segmentation methods in PET imaging?
    Dewalle-Vignion AS; Betrouni N; Baillet C; Vermandel M
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(24):9473-91. PubMed ID: 26584044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.