258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19217953)
1. Controversy over "contradiction": Should randomized trials always trump observational studies?
Fletcher AE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 147(3):384-6. PubMed ID: 19217953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Don't throw out the observation studies with the bath-water. Assess their quality instead].
Rosén M; Axelsson S; Lindblom J
Lakartidningen; 2008 Nov 5-11; 105(45):3191-4. PubMed ID: 19062610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Danger of misuse of meta-analyses for observational studies based on published data.
Sauerbrei W; Blettner M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():33. PubMed ID: 11187567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Expanding the evidence base in transplantation: the complementary roles of randomized controlled trials and outcomes research.
Takemoto SK; Arns W; Bunnapradist S; Garrison LP; Guirado L; Kalo Z; Oniscu G; Opelz G; Scolari MP; Stefoni S; Yaqoob M; Brennan DC
Transplantation; 2008 Jul; 86(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18622271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does analysis using "last observation carried forward" introduce bias in dementia research?
Molnar FJ; Hutton B; Fergusson D
CMAJ; 2008 Oct; 179(8):751-3. PubMed ID: 18838445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. From randomized trials to registry studies: translating data into clinical information.
Brown ML; Gersh BJ; Holmes DR; Bailey KR; Sundt TM
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med; 2008 Oct; 5(10):613-20. PubMed ID: 18679381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized trials and observational studies: still mostly similar results, still crucial differences.
Kunz R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):207-8. PubMed ID: 18226743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Methods in epidemiology: observational study designs.
DiPietro NA
Pharmacotherapy; 2010 Oct; 30(10):973-84. PubMed ID: 20874034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond randomized controlled trials: a critical comparison of trials with nonrandomized studies.
Sørensen HT; Lash TL; Rothman KJ
Hepatology; 2006 Nov; 44(5):1075-82. PubMed ID: 17058242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An introduction to instrumental variables analysis: part 1.
Bennett DA
Neuroepidemiology; 2010; 35(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 20861655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Study designs for the evaluation of drug effects].
Christensen S; Christiansen CF; Sørensen HT
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Mar; 171(10):799-802. PubMed ID: 19265605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strengthening the case for disease management effectiveness: un-hiding the hidden bias.
Linden A; Adams JL; Roberts N
J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Apr; 12(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 16579822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized controlled studies: scientific evidence or disinformation?
Ekroth R; Ståhle E
Scand Cardiovasc J; 2011 Jun; 45(3):131-2. PubMed ID: 21388251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Epidemiology versus clinical trial. A five-round-match on scientific reliability].
Lafolie P
Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3132-4. PubMed ID: 12198935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The limitations of observational research].
van der Zee AG; de Vries EG; Schaapveld M; Willemse PH
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009 Jan; 153(3):102; author reply 102. PubMed ID: 19235351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. CONSORT comes to TRANSFUSION.
Heddle NM; Ness PM
Transfusion; 2009 Feb; 49(2):194-5. PubMed ID: 19389202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An overview of study design.
Cardwell JM
J Small Anim Pract; 2008 May; 49(5):217-8. PubMed ID: 18445164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized and observational studies in nephrology: how strong is the evidence?
Greene T
Am J Kidney Dis; 2009 Mar; 53(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 19185399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
