These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Interpretation of research data. Are you also a "statistical analphabet?"]. Füessl HS MMW Fortschr Med; 2009 Oct; 151(44):6-7. PubMed ID: 19957465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles. Lang T Croat Med J; 2004 Aug; 45(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15311405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistical strategies to assess reliability in ophthalmology. Patton N; Aslam T; Murray G Eye (Lond); 2006 Jul; 20(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 16327799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use and interpretation of linear regression analysis in ophthalmology research. Boscardin WJ Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jul; 150(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 20609702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ten common statistical errors and how to avoid them. Zinsmeister AR; Connor JT Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Feb; 103(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 18289193 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The importance of validation in ophthalmic medical claims database research. Forooghian F Can J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 52(2):143-144. PubMed ID: 28457280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Discussion of research using propensity-score matching: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine. Hill J Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2055-61; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18446836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Statistical quality requires improvement in ophthalmic research]. Ren ZQ Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Dec; 41(12):1065-7. PubMed ID: 16409755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical research of kidney diseases III: principles of regression and modelling. Ravani P; Parfrey P; Gadag V; Malberti F; Barrett B Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Dec; 22(12):3422-30. PubMed ID: 18029371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. P-values in research reports. Ranstam J Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):289-90. PubMed ID: 16156452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [What is the "number at risk?"]. Lange S Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2005 Nov; 130(44):2528. PubMed ID: 16252215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing practical recommendations for the use of propensity scores: discussion of 'A critical appraisal of propensity score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine. Stuart EA Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2062-5; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18286673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistics: making sense of what we see. Scott M; Flaherty D; Currall J J Small Anim Pract; 2011 Nov; 52(11):560-5. PubMed ID: 22026741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The choice of a margin of error in the calculation of an appropriate sample size in health research. Enquselassie F Ethiop Med J; 2009 Jan; 47(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 19743787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]