These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19217955)

  • 1. Descriptive statistics in ophthalmic research.
    Yu F; Afifi AA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 147(3):389-91. PubMed ID: 19217955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ophthalmic statistics note 5: diagnostic tests—sensitivity and specificity.
    Saunders LJ; Zhu H; Bunce C; Doré CJ; Freemantle N; Crabb DP;
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1168-70. PubMed ID: 25488948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Interpretation of research data. Are you also a "statistical analphabet?"].
    Füessl HS
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2009 Oct; 151(44):6-7. PubMed ID: 19957465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ophthalmic statistics note 8: missing data--exploring the unknown.
    Bunce C; Quartilho A; Freemantle N; Doré CJ;
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 100(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 26719490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Introducing critical statistics analysis in an article].
    Coutant C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 Sep; 37(9):765-6. PubMed ID: 19699132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ophthalmic statistics note 14: method agreement studies in ophthalmology: the intraclass correlation coefficient?
    Bunce C; Czanner G; Moschandreas J; Stratton IM; Doré C; Freemantle N;
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Aug; 104(8):1033-1035. PubMed ID: 32277011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles.
    Lang T
    Croat Med J; 2004 Aug; 45(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15311405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical strategies to assess reliability in ophthalmology.
    Patton N; Aslam T; Murray G
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Jul; 20(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 16327799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use and interpretation of linear regression analysis in ophthalmology research.
    Boscardin WJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jul; 150(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 20609702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ten common statistical errors and how to avoid them.
    Zinsmeister AR; Connor JT
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Feb; 103(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 18289193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The importance of validation in ophthalmic medical claims database research.
    Forooghian F
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 52(2):143-144. PubMed ID: 28457280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discussion of research using propensity-score matching: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Hill J
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2055-61; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18446836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ophthalmic statistics note: the perils of dichotomising continuous variables.
    Cumberland PM; Czanner G; Bunce C; Doré CJ; Freemantle N; García-Fiñana M;
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 98(6):841-3. PubMed ID: 24682179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Statistical quality requires improvement in ophthalmic research].
    Ren ZQ
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Dec; 41(12):1065-7. PubMed ID: 16409755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical research of kidney diseases III: principles of regression and modelling.
    Ravani P; Parfrey P; Gadag V; Malberti F; Barrett B
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Dec; 22(12):3422-30. PubMed ID: 18029371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. P-values in research reports.
    Ranstam J
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):289-90. PubMed ID: 16156452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [What is the "number at risk?"].
    Lange S
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2005 Nov; 130(44):2528. PubMed ID: 16252215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing practical recommendations for the use of propensity scores: discussion of 'A critical appraisal of propensity score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Stuart EA
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2062-5; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18286673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistics: making sense of what we see.
    Scott M; Flaherty D; Currall J
    J Small Anim Pract; 2011 Nov; 52(11):560-5. PubMed ID: 22026741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The choice of a margin of error in the calculation of an appropriate sample size in health research.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2009 Jan; 47(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 19743787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.