These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19218038)

  • 1. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
    Saper CB
    Neurobiol Dis; 2009 Mar; 33(3):313-4. PubMed ID: 19218038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
    Saper CB; Maunsell JH
    Neuroinformatics; 2009 Jun; 7(2):89-91. PubMed ID: 19172416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The neuroscience peer review consortium.
    Saper CB; Maunsell JH
    Brain Struct Funct; 2009 Sep; 213(4-5):359-61. PubMed ID: 19308445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
    Saper CB; Maunsell JH;
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Jun; 457(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 19410133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
    Saper CB
    Exp Neurol; 2009 Mar; 216(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 19217967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neuroendocrinologies membership of the Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
    Saper CB; Maunsell JH
    Neuroendocrinology; 2009; 89(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 19176976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
    J Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 29(5):1255-6. PubMed ID: 19193872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
    Saper CB; Maunsell JH
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 29(3):435-6. PubMed ID: 19222555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review and refereeing in science.
    Lore W
    East Afr Med J; 1995 May; 72(5):335-7. PubMed ID: 7555893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structure and format of peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts.
    Manske PR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 31(7):1051-5. PubMed ID: 16945702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What journal editors would like from reviewers.
    Alspach G
    Crit Care Nurse; 1994 Dec; 14(6):13-6. PubMed ID: 7712795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tracking the peer-review process.
    Campion EW; Curfman GD; Drazen JM
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Nov; 343(20):1485-6. PubMed ID: 11078775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An exciting year for neuroscience, and for Neuroscience Letters.
    Waxman SG
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Dec; 467(3):187. PubMed ID: 19818383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why are people reluctant to join in open review?
    Liu SV
    Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1052. PubMed ID: 17597736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Welcome to molecular brain.
    Mei L; Cho K; Lee CJ; Li XJ; Zhuo M; Kaang BK
    Mol Brain; 2008 Jun; 1():1. PubMed ID: 18803854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three cheers for peers.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Open-access journal will publish first, judge later.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7123):9. PubMed ID: 17203032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ten simple rules for getting published.
    Bourne PE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2005 Oct; 1(5):e57. PubMed ID: 16261197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review of manuscripts: theory and practice.
    Young SN
    J Psychiatry Neurosci; 2003 Sep; 28(5):327-30. PubMed ID: 14517575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.