These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Peer review and refereeing in science. Lore W East Afr Med J; 1995 May; 72(5):335-7. PubMed ID: 7555893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process. Giles J Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Structure and format of peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts. Manske PR J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 31(7):1051-5. PubMed ID: 16945702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What journal editors would like from reviewers. Alspach G Crit Care Nurse; 1994 Dec; 14(6):13-6. PubMed ID: 7712795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tracking the peer-review process. Campion EW; Curfman GD; Drazen JM N Engl J Med; 2000 Nov; 343(20):1485-6. PubMed ID: 11078775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An exciting year for neuroscience, and for Neuroscience Letters. Waxman SG Neurosci Lett; 2009 Dec; 467(3):187. PubMed ID: 19818383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Why are people reluctant to join in open review? Liu SV Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1052. PubMed ID: 17597736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Welcome to molecular brain. Mei L; Cho K; Lee CJ; Li XJ; Zhuo M; Kaang BK Mol Brain; 2008 Jun; 1():1. PubMed ID: 18803854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three cheers for peers. Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]