These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19218849)
1. Basic meta-analysis: conceptualization and computation. Verhulst SJ; Colliver JA J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2009 Feb; 30(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 19218849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the meta-analysis of correlation coefficients accurate when population correlations vary? Field AP Psychol Methods; 2005 Dec; 10(4):444-67. PubMed ID: 16392999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle. Jarmasz J; Hollands JG Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Jun; 63(2):124-38. PubMed ID: 19485604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis. Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Chacón-Moscoso S Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):448-67. PubMed ID: 14664682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical considerations in evaluating pharmacogenomics-based clinical effect for confirmatory trials. Wang SJ; O'Neill RT; Hung HJ Clin Trials; 2010 Oct; 7(5):525-36. PubMed ID: 20595242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental psychology: a note on statistical analysis. Erdfelder E Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20176548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Some properties of r equivalent: a simple effect size indicator. Hsu LM Psychol Methods; 2005 Dec; 10(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 16392997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies require study by study examination: first for heterogeneity, and then for sources of heterogeneity. Begg CB J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):865-6. PubMed ID: 16085189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. SPSS and SAS programs for addressing interdependence and basic levels-of-analysis issues in psychological data. O'Connor BP Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Feb; 36(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 15190696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Five easy pieces on evidence-based medicine (4). Kalso E; Edwards J; McQuay HJ; Moore RA Eur J Pain; 2002; 6(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 11888232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A Monte-Carlo estimation of effect size distortion due to significance testing. Bradley MT; Smith D; Stoica G Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):837-42. PubMed ID: 12509183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test. Guo JH; Luh WM Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18157920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data. Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 16755545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Drawing generalized causal inferences based on meta-analysis. Matt GE NIDA Res Monogr; 1997; 170():165-82. PubMed ID: 9154257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Dependent effect sizes in meta-analysis: incorporating the degree of interdependence. Cheung SF; Chan DK J Appl Psychol; 2004 Oct; 89(5):780-91. PubMed ID: 15506860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Issues and challenges in coding interventions for meta-analysis of prevention research. Devine EC NIDA Res Monogr; 1997; 170():130-46. PubMed ID: 9154255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis. Tang JL; Liu JL J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 May; 53(5):477-84. PubMed ID: 10812319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-analysis of adolescent drug prevention programs: results of the 1993 meta-analysis. Tobler NS NIDA Res Monogr; 1997; 170():5-68. PubMed ID: 9154251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]