287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19218849)
21. A simple effect size indicator for two-group comparisons? A comment on r equivalent.
Kraemer HC
Psychol Methods; 2005 Dec; 10(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 16392996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How accurate is the Pearson r-from-Z approximation? A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Hittner JB; May K
J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 24836910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs.
Olejnik S; Algina J
Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):434-47. PubMed ID: 14664681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Quo vadis meta-analysis? A potentially dangerous tool if used without adequate rules.
Michels KB
Important Adv Oncol; 1992; ():243-8. PubMed ID: 1582676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. On the validity of meta-analyses: exhaustivity must be warranted, exclusion of duplicate patients too.
Pambrun E; Bouteloup V; Thiébaut R; Asselineau J; de Lédinghen V; Perez P;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):342-3. PubMed ID: 20079606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis.
Peterson RA; Brown SP
J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jan; 90(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 15641898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science.
Francis G
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Oct; 21(5):1180-7. PubMed ID: 24638826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences.
Bonett DG
Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 19719359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robust statistical methods: A primer for clinical psychology and experimental psychopathology researchers.
Field AP; Wilcox RR
Behav Res Ther; 2017 Nov; 98():19-38. PubMed ID: 28577757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing the accuracy of experimental estimates to guessing: a new perspective on replication and the "Crisis of Confidence" in psychology.
Davis-Stober CP; Dana J
Behav Res Methods; 2014 Mar; 46(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 23661222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Correcting overestimated effect size estimates in multiple trials.
Wiedermann W; Gula B; Czech P; Muschik D
J Gen Psychol; 2011; 138(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 24836567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. r equivalent: A simple effect size indicator.
Rosenthal R; Rubin DB
Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):492-496. PubMed ID: 14664684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A meta-analysis of controlled trials of anticoagulant therapies in patients with sepsis.
Macias WL; Sasheygi A; Xu D; Freeman BD
Shock; 2003 Dec; 20(6):582-3; author reply 583-4. PubMed ID: 14625485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. More than one statistical strategy to assess agreement of quantitative measurements may usefully be reported.
Luiz RR; Szklo M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):215-6. PubMed ID: 15718108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [The meta-analysis of clinical studies: the philosopher's stone or a bone of contention?].
Baumann M
Strahlenther Onkol; 1999 Apr; 175 Suppl 1():17-20. PubMed ID: 10230453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimating standardized linear contrasts of means with desired precision.
Bonett DG
Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19271844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. P(rep) misestimates the probability of replication.
Iverson GJ; Lee MD; Wagenmakers EJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):424-9. PubMed ID: 19293117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Least sum of Euclidean regression residuals: estimation of effect size.
Berry KJ; Mielke PW
Psychol Rep; 2002 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):955-62. PubMed ID: 12530751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
