These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19218995)

  • 1. Accuracy of corneal flap thickness achieved by two different age MK-2000 microkeratomes.
    Hsu SY; Liu YL; Chang MS; Lin CP
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Dec; 23(12):2200-5. PubMed ID: 19218995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corneal flap thickness with the Moria M2 microkeratome and Med-Logics calibrated LASIK blades.
    Pietilä J; Huhtala A; Mäkinen P; Seppänen M; Jääskeläinen M; Uusitalo H
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov; 87(7):754-8. PubMed ID: 19456311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laser in situ keratomileusis flap thickness using the Hansatome microkeratome with zero compression heads.
    Taneri S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jan; 32(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 16516782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using three different microkeratomes.
    Shemesh G; Dotan G; Lipshitz I
    J Refract Surg; 2002; 18(3 Suppl):S347-51. PubMed ID: 12046880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flap thickness accuracy: comparison of 6 microkeratome models.
    Solomon KD; Donnenfeld E; Sandoval HP; Al Sarraf O; Kasper TJ; Holzer MP; Slate EH; Vroman DT;
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 May; 30(5):964-77. PubMed ID: 15130631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of corneal flap thickness between primary and fellow eyes using three microkeratomes.
    Shemesh G; Leibovitch I; Lipshitz I
    J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(5):417-21. PubMed ID: 15523951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Corneal flap assessment with Rondo microkeratome in laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Paschalis EI; Aristeidou AP; Foudoulakis NC; Razis LA
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 249(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 20577755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assessment model of 3 different microkeratomes through confocal microscopy.
    Javaloy Estañ J; Vidal MT; Quinto A; De Rojas V; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jun; 30(6):1300-9. PubMed ID: 15177608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corneal flap thickness during laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Hsu SY
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2007 Jan; 23(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 17282982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of corneal flap thickness between primary eyes and fellow eyes using the Zyoptix XP microkeratome.
    Ho T; Cheng AC; Lau S; Lam DS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2049-53. PubMed ID: 18053902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting laser in situ keratomileusis flap thickness: comparison of 2 microkeratome heads.
    Mimouni M; Nemet AY; Levartovsky S; Sela T; Munzer G; Kaiserman I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Feb; 41(2):348-53. PubMed ID: 25661128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal flap thickness with the Moria M2 single-use head 90 microkeratome.
    Huhtala A; Pietilä J; Mäkinen P; Suominen S; Seppänen M; Uusitalo H
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Jun; 85(4):401-6. PubMed ID: 17559465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of actual corneal flap thickness and confounding factors between first and second operated eyes.
    Hsu SY; Chen HY; Chung CP
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2009; 40(5):448-52. PubMed ID: 19772267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corneal flap thickness and topography changes induced by flap creation during laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Güell JL; Velasco F; Roberts C; Sisquella MT; Mahmoud A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 15721703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the Ziemer FEMTO LDV femtosecond laser and Moria M2 mechanical microkeratome.
    Zhou Y; Zhang J; Tian L; Zhai C
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 22373033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective analysis of actual LASIK flap diameter compared with microkeratome ring size performed by different surgeons.
    Mahler O; Sofinski SJ; Gimbel HV; Kassab J; Penno EE; Van Westenbrugge JA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jun; 30(6):1320-5. PubMed ID: 15177611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Kezirian GM; Stonecipher KG
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Apr; 30(4):804-11. PubMed ID: 15093642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flap-induced astigmatism in eyes with sphere myopia correction: Superior hinge using a rotating microkeratome versus nasal hinge using a linear microkeratome.
    Katz T; Frings A; Richard G; Steinberg J; Druchkiv V; Linke SJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Jun; 41(6):1160-7. PubMed ID: 26189377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative performance of the Zyoptix XP and Hansatome zero-compression microkeratomes.
    Pepose JS; Feigenbaum SK; Qazi MA; Merchea M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1386-91. PubMed ID: 17662429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nidek MK 2000 microkeratome clinical evaluation.
    Arbelaez MC
    J Refract Surg; 2002; 18(3 Suppl):S357-60. PubMed ID: 12046882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.