These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1921931)
1. Professional peer review. Precautions for physicians. Struthers MS; Snelson EA Minn Med; 1991 Aug; 74(8):27-30. PubMed ID: 1921931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review/hospital privileges/credentialing. Springer EW Leg Med; 1994; ():57-81. PubMed ID: 7830486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Strategies for eliminating unfairness in peer review. Rozovsky FA; Rozovsky LE Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10115449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply? Meghrigian AG Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The antitrust laws and the medical peer review process. Hammack JM J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():419-50. PubMed ID: 10126945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims? Cross LL Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The peer review privilege: a dying cause? McKinney P J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Court cases testing scope of federal law's peer review immunity. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1992 Aug; 22(34):80. PubMed ID: 10119842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hospital liability for defamation of character during the peer review process: sticks and stones may break my bones, but words may cost me my job. Oliverio J Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Sep; (151):7-28. PubMed ID: 10114742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: a view from the Federal Trade Commission. Horoschak MJ Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):17-24. PubMed ID: 10116790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical staff peer review and federal antitrust scrutiny. LaCava FW Bull Am Coll Surg; 1985 Aug; 70(8):40-1. PubMed ID: 10272117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Legal aspects of the medical staff peer review process. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986--boon or bane? Couch JB Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 Feb; 3(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 2980922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer review in the wake of Patrick. McCormick B Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):17. PubMed ID: 10288090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Data bank reporting requirements pose vexing issues. Tapay N Physician Exec; 1992; 18(1):53-4. PubMed ID: 10116425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peer review after Patrick case is alive and well. Holthaus D Hospitals; 1988 Oct; 62(20):34. PubMed ID: 3169708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]