BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19219400)

  • 1. Validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis to hydrostatic weighing in male body builders.
    Volpe SL; Melanson EL; Kline G
    Acta Diabetol; 2010 Mar; 47(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 19219400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bioelectric impedance and hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion in persons who are morbidly obese.
    Heath EM; Adams TD; Daines MM; Hunt SC
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1998 Aug; 98(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 9710656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of four methods to assess body composition in women.
    Eaton AW; Israel RG; O'Brien KF; Hortobagyi T; McCammon MR
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1993 May; 47(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 8319671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of dehydration on wrestling minimum weight assessment.
    Bartok C; Schoeller DA; Randall Clark R; Sullivan JC; Landry GL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2004 Jan; 36(1):160-7. PubMed ID: 14707783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of leg-to-leg BIA in assessing body composition in high-school-aged males and females.
    Unick JL; Utter AC; Schumm S; McInnis T
    Res Sports Med; 2006; 14(4):301-13. PubMed ID: 17214406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of percent body fat estimations in males.
    Stout JR; Eckerson JM; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Betts NM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 May; 26(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 8007813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in a representative sample of 6- to 13-year-old children.
    Kriemler S; Puder J; Zahner L; Roth R; Braun-Fahrländer C; Bedogni G
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2009 May; 63(5):619-26. PubMed ID: 18285806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of bioelectrical impedance equations for estimating fat-free weight in lean males.
    Eckerson JM; Housh TJ; Johnson GO
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1992 Nov; 24(11):1298-302. PubMed ID: 1435182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women.
    Thomson R; Brinkworth GD; Buckley JD; Noakes M; Clifton PM
    Clin Nutr; 2007 Dec; 26(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 17936443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analyser in highly active, moderately active and less active young men.
    Swartz AM; Swartz AM; Jeremy Evans M; King GA; Thompson DL
    Br J Nutr; 2002 Aug; 88(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 12144724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation in community surveys of total body fat of children using bioelectrical impedance or skinfold thickness measurements.
    Hammond J; Rona RJ; Chinn S
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1994 Mar; 48(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 8194501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Changes of body fat mass determined by be-electrical impedance and by anthropometry: BMI method and skinfolds method in overweight and obese women after implementation of low energy diet].
    Pachocka L
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1999; 50(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 10789216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lactation performance of rural Mesoamerindians.
    Villalpando SF; Butte NF; Wong WW; Flores-Huerta S; Hernandez-Beltran MJ; Smith EO; Garza C
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1992 May; 46(5):337-48. PubMed ID: 1600932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of percent body fat in adult males using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, skinfolds, and hydrostatic weighing.
    Clark RR; Kuta JM; Sullivan JC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Apr; 25(4):528-35. PubMed ID: 8479309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Underestimation of percentage fat mass measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry method in obese children.
    Eisenkölbl J; Kartasurya M; Widhalm K
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2001 Jun; 55(6):423-9. PubMed ID: 11423918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tanita foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis system validated in older adults.
    Ritchie JD; Miller CK; Smiciklas-Wright H
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Oct; 105(10):1617-9. PubMed ID: 16183365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in estimates of percent body fat using bioelectrical impedance.
    Kaminsky LA; Whaley MH
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 1993 Jun; 33(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 8412053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of body composition in Sri Lankan children: validation of a bioelectrical impedance prediction equation.
    Wickramasinghe VP; Lamabadusuriya SP; Cleghorn GJ; Davies PS
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2008 Oct; 62(10):1170-7. PubMed ID: 17700653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive validity of four bioelectrical impedance equations in determining percent fat mass in overweight and obese children.
    Cleary J; Daniells S; Okely AD; Batterham M; Nicholls J
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Jan; 108(1):136-9. PubMed ID: 18156000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wrestlers' minimal weight: anthropometry, bioimpedance, and hydrostatic weighing compared.
    Oppliger RA; Nielsen DH; Vance CG
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1991 Feb; 23(2):247-53. PubMed ID: 2017023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.