62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19219447)
1. The fetal cheek-to-cheek diameter and abdominal circumference: are they correlated?
Kerrick H; Sheiner E; Mandell C; Guse D; Pombar X; Hussey MJ; Strassner HT; Abramowicz JS
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Oct; 280(4):585-8. PubMed ID: 19219447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal cheek-to-cheek diameter in the prediction of mode of delivery.
Abramowicz JS; Rana S; Abramowicz S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1205-11; discussion 1211-3. PubMed ID: 15846203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Ultrasound monitoring].
Biquard F; Fournié A
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Oct; 31(6 Suppl):4S18-4S20. PubMed ID: 12451354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term.
Kayem G; Grangé G; Bréart G; Goffinet F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 34(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 19582801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of maternal lipids on the fetal growth in gestational diabetes.
Horosz E; Bomba-Opon D; Wielgos M; Szymanska M; Bartkowiak R
Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(5):652-6. PubMed ID: 20035261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Small fetal abdominal circumference in the second trimester and subsequent low maternal plasma glucose after a glucose challenge test is associated with the delivery of a small-for-gestational age neonate.
Bienstock JL; Holcroft CJ; Althaus J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 May; 31(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 18432604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Fetal weight estimation in children of diabetes mellitus mothers].
García de Yeguez M; Castro Valderrama CR; Yegüez F; Rivas Blasco A
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2007 Jan; 75(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 17542262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The cheek-to-cheek diameter in the ultrasonographic assessment of fetal growth.
Abramowicz JS; Sherer DM; Bar-Tov E; Woods JR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Oct; 165(4 Pt 1):846-52. PubMed ID: 1951542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of impaired 50-gram oral glucose challenge test on fetal abdominal wall thickness.
Aksoy H; Aksoy U; Açmaz G; Tutuş S
Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2014 Oct; 30(7):570-4. PubMed ID: 24353250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of sonographically estimated fetal weight in 840 women with different pregnancy complications prior to induction of labor.
Ben-Haroush A; Yogev Y; Bar J; Mashiach R; Kaplan B; Hod M; Meizner I
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 23(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 14770399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study of accuracy of commonly used fetal parameters for estimation of gestational age.
Karki DB; Sharmqa UK; Rauniyar RK
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2006; 45(162):233-7. PubMed ID: 17189967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness may be an early ultrasonographic sign of gestational diabetes mellitus.
Aksoy H; Aksoy Ü; Yücel B; Saygi Özyurt S; Aydın T; Alparslan Babayiğit M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(12):2028-32. PubMed ID: 26333303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The accuracy of ultrasound-estimated fetal weight in extremely preterm infants: a comparison of small for gestational age and appropriate for gestational age.
Stefanelli S; Groom KM
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Apr; 54(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 24571274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences in amniotic fluid patterns and fetal biometric parameters in third trimester pregnancies with and without diabetes.
Kofinas A; Kofinas G
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Oct; 19(10):633-8. PubMed ID: 17118737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of fetal weight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness in the late third trimester.
Scioscia M; Scioscia F; Vimercati A; Caradonna F; Nardelli C; Pinto LR; Selvaggi LE
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 18307214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reference charts for fetal biometric parameters in twin pregnancies according to chorionicity.
Araujo Júnior E; Ruano R; Javadian P; Martins WP; Elito J; Pires CR; Zanforlin Filho SM
Prenat Diagn; 2014 Apr; 34(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 24395124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Birth-weight prediction by two- and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging.
Bennini JR; Marussi EF; Barini R; Faro C; Peralta CF
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):426-33. PubMed ID: 20069666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sonographic assessment of fetal subcutaneous fat tissue thickness as an indicator of gestational diabetes.
Tantanasis T; Daniilidis A; Giannoulis C; Tzafettas M; Dinas K; Loufopoulos A; Papathanasiou K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Oct; 152(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 20609509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
