These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19221059)

  • 1. Uterine cervical carcinoma: preoperative staging with 3.0-T MR imaging--comparison with 1.5-T MR imaging.
    Hori M; Kim T; Murakami T; Imaoka I; Onishi H; Tomoda K; Tsutsui T; Enomoto T; Kimura T; Nakamura H
    Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 19221059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MR imaging of endometrial carcinoma for preoperative staging at 3.0 T: comparison with imaging at 1.5 T.
    Hori M; Kim T; Murakami T; Imaoka I; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Nakaya Y; Tomoda K; Tsutsui T; Enomoto T; Kimura T; Nakamura H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 30(3):621-30. PubMed ID: 19711413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation - ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability.
    Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Coakley FV; Snyder B; Reinhold C; Schwartz LH; Woodward PJ; Pannu HK; Amendola M; Mitchell DG
    Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 17940305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR imaging--initial experience.
    Lin G; Ng KK; Chang CJ; Wang JJ; Ho KC; Yen TC; Wu TI; Wang CC; Chen YR; Huang YT; Ng SH; Jung SM; Chang TC; Lai CH
    Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):784-92. PubMed ID: 19244045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uterine tumors: comparison of 3D versus 2D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging at 3.0 T--initial experience.
    Hori M; Kim T; Onishi H; Ueguchi T; Tatsumi M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Tomoda K; Tomiyama N
    Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 21045182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin-echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging.
    Yu KK; Hricak H; Subak LL; Zaloudek CJ; Powell CB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Sep; 171(3):707-11. PubMed ID: 9725301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning.
    Manfredi R; Mirk P; Maresca G; Margariti PA; Testa A; Zannoni GF; Giordano D; Scambia G; Marano P
    Radiology; 2004 May; 231(2):372-8. PubMed ID: 15031434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the use of the transrectal surface coil and the pelvic phased-array coil in MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of uterine cervical carcinoma.
    Kim MJ; Chung JJ; Lee YH; Lee JT; Yoo HS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1215-21. PubMed ID: 9129414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rectal cancer: comparison of accuracy of local-regional staging with two- and three-dimensional preoperative 3-T MR imaging.
    Kim H; Lim JS; Choi JY; Park J; Chung YE; Kim MJ; Choi E; Kim NK; Kim KW
    Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):485-92. PubMed ID: 20093520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nodal metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer: accuracy of 3.0-T MR imaging.
    Kim HY; Yi CA; Lee KS; Chung MJ; Kim YK; Choi BK; Kim H; Kwon OJ
    Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):596-604. PubMed ID: 18056854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gadobutrol-enhanced, three-dimensional, dynamic MR imaging with MR cholangiography for the preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer.
    Ryoo I; Lee JM; Chung YE; Park HS; Kim SH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Apr; 45(4):217-24. PubMed ID: 20195160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension.
    deSouza NM; Dina R; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16427688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate cancer: local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging--early experience.
    Fütterer JJ; Heijmink SW; Scheenen TW; Jager GJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 16304091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Locally advanced rectal cancer: MR imaging for restaging after neoadjuvant radiation therapy with concomitant chemotherapy. Part II. What are the criteria to predict involved lymph nodes?
    Lahaye MJ; Beets GL; Engelen SM; Kessels AG; de Bruïne AP; Kwee HW; van Engelshoven JM; van de Velde CJ; Beets-Tan RG
    Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 19403848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma: evaluation of detection at MR imaging with fat suppression.
    Scheidler J; Heuck AF; Steinborn M; Kimmig R; Reiser MF
    Radiology; 1998 Jan; 206(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 9423661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of depth of myometrial invasion and overall staging in endometrial cancer: comparison of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
    Beddy P; Moyle P; Kataoka M; Yamamoto AK; Joubert I; Lomas D; Crawford R; Sala E
    Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):530-7. PubMed ID: 22114239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance.
    Heijmink SW; Fütterer JJ; Hambrock T; Takahashi S; Scheenen TW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Knipscheer BC; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 17495178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is dynamic gadolinium enhancement needed in MR imaging for the preoperative assessment of scaphoidal viability in patients with scaphoid nonunion?
    Donati OF; Zanetti M; Nagy L; Bode B; Schweizer A; Pfirrmann CW
    Radiology; 2011 Sep; 260(3):808-16. PubMed ID: 21712471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-small cell lung cancer staging: efficacy comparison of integrated PET/CT versus 3.0-T whole-body MR imaging.
    Yi CA; Shin KM; Lee KS; Kim BT; Kim H; Kwon OJ; Choi JY; Chung MJ
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):632-42. PubMed ID: 18552311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IB cervical cancer: comparison of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T.
    Lin Y; Chen Z; Kuang F; Li H; Zhong Q; Ma M
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):989-94. PubMed ID: 24270123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.