These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19221169)
1. Sample size determination for the non-randomised triangular model for sensitive questions in a survey. Tian GL; Tang ML; Zhenqiu Liu ; Ming Tan ; Tang NS Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):159-73. PubMed ID: 19221169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incidence of induced abortion determined by the randomised response technique. Rajapaksa LC; Perera DC Ceylon Med J; 1994 Mar; 39(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 8194140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Power and sample size computations in simultaneous tests for non-inferiority based on relative margins. Dilba G; Bretz F; Hothorn LA; Guiard V Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1131-47. PubMed ID: 16217842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test. Guo JH; Luh WM Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18157920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sample size determination for assessing equivalence based on proportion ratio under a randomized trial with non-compliance and missing outcomes. Lui KJ; Chang KC Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 17708514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample size determination for comparing several survival curves with unequal allocations. Halabi S; Singh B Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1793-815. PubMed ID: 15160409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sample size determination for matched-pair equivalence trials using rate ratio. Tang NS; Tang ML; Wang SF Biostatistics; 2007 Jul; 8(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 17071862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal sample sizes for Welch's test under various allocation and cost considerations. Jan SL; Shieh G Behav Res Methods; 2011 Dec; 43(4):1014-22. PubMed ID: 21512873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sample size determination in step-up testing procedures for multiple comparisons with a control. Kwong KS; Cheung SH; Wen MJ Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(26):2743-56. PubMed ID: 20799258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample size estimation for GEE method for comparing slopes in repeated measurements data. Jung SH; Ahn C Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1305-15. PubMed ID: 12687656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating induced abortion in developing countries: methods and problems. Barreto T; Campbell OM; Davies JL; Fauveau V; Filippi VG; Graham WJ; Mamdani M; Rooney CI; Toubia NF Stud Fam Plann; 1992; 23(3):159-70. PubMed ID: 1523696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sample size, power calculations, and their implications for the cost of thorough studies of drug induced QT interval prolongation. Malik M; Hnatkova K; Batchvarov V; Gang Y; Smetana P; Camm AJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Dec; 27(12):1659-69. PubMed ID: 15613131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A general approach for sample size and statistical power calculations assessing of interventions using a mixture model in the presence of detection limits. Nie L; Chu H; Cole SR Contemp Clin Trials; 2006 Oct; 27(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 16769254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sample size and power analysis in medical research. Zodpey SP Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2004; 70(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 17642587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sequential tests for gene-environment interactions in matched case-control studies. Tweel Iv; Schipper M Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(24):3755-71. PubMed ID: 15580604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confidence intervals and sample-size calculations for the sisterhood method of estimating maternal mortality. Hanley JA; Hagen CA; Shiferaw T Stud Fam Plann; 1996; 27(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 8875734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blinded sample size recalculation for clinical trials with normal data and baseline adjusted analysis. Friede T; Kieser M Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 19943322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation. Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An algorithm for the design of group sequential triangular tests for single-arm clinical trials with a binary endpoint. McWilliams TP Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(27):2794-801. PubMed ID: 20860065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]