117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19221185)
1. Investigating the exposure class of a computed radiography system for optimisation of physical image quality for chest radiography.
Moore CS; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Br J Radiol; 2009 Aug; 82(981):705-10. PubMed ID: 19221185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of optimum X-ray beam tube voltage and filtration for chest radiography with a computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):771-7. PubMed ID: 18662964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship Between Tube Voltage and Physical Image Quality of Pulmonary Nodules on Chest Radiographs Obtained Using the Bone-Suppression Technique.
Takagi S; Yaegashi T; Ishikawa M
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):e174-e179. PubMed ID: 30269955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation between the signal-to-noise ratio improvement factor (KSNR) and clinical image quality for chest imaging with a computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):9047-58. PubMed ID: 26540441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of image quality among three X-ray systems for chest radiography: first step in optimisation.
Nocetti D; Ubeda C; Calcagno S; Acevedo J; Pardo D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):386-91. PubMed ID: 25821212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A method to optimize the processing algorithm of a computed radiography system for chest radiography.
Moore CS; Liney GP; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2007 Sep; 80(957):724-30. PubMed ID: 17709364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of a computer simulator to investigate optimized tube voltage for chest imaging of average patients with a digital radiography (DR) imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood T; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Joshi H; Ahmed N; Saunderson J; Beavis A
Br J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 92(1104):20190470. PubMed ID: 31559857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. One-shot dual-energy subtraction chest imaging with computed radiography: clinical evaluation of film images.
Ishigaki T; Sakuma S; Ikeda M
Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 3289096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method to produce and validate a digitally reconstructed radiograph-based computer simulation for optimisation of chest radiographs acquired with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Liney GP; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2011 Oct; 84(1006):890-902. PubMed ID: 21933979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of contrast-to-noise ratio in optimizing beam quality for digital chest radiography: comparison of experimental measurements and theoretical simulations.
Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2953-70. PubMed ID: 16723777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: summary of the RADIUS chest trial.
Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):114-20. PubMed ID: 15933091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130077. PubMed ID: 23568362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of pulmonary function using breathing chest radiography with a dynamic flat panel detector: primary results in pulmonary diseases.
Tanaka R; Sanada S; Okazaki N; Kobayashi T; Fujimura M; Yasui M; Matsui T; Nakayama K; Nanbu Y; Matsui O
Invest Radiol; 2006 Oct; 41(10):735-45. PubMed ID: 16971797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of image acquisition techniques for dual-energy imaging of the chest.
Shkumat NA; Siewerdsen JH; Dhanantwari AC; Williams DB; Richard S; Paul NS; Yorkston J; Van Metter R
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3904-15. PubMed ID: 17985636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distributions of scatter-to-primary and signal-to-noise ratios per pixel in digital chest imaging.
Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Hunt R; Alm Carlsson G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):355-8. PubMed ID: 15933136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
