117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19221185)
21. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Filter wheel equalization in chest radiography: demonstration with a prototype system.
Boone JM; Duryea J; Moore EH
Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 7644654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: introduction to the RADIUS chest trial.
Båth M; Håkansson M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):85-91. PubMed ID: 15933086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Volumetric measurement pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules with multi-detector CT: effect of various tube current on measurement accuracy--a chest CT phantom study.
Linning E; Daqing M
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):934-9. PubMed ID: 19409818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optimal beam quality for chest computed radiography.
Oda N; Nakata H; Murakami S; Terada K; Nakamura K; Yoshida A
Invest Radiol; 1996 Mar; 31(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 8675419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative assessment of the influence of anatomic noise on the detection of subtle lung nodule in digital chest radiography using fractal-feature distance.
Imai K; Ikeda M; Enchi Y; Niimi T
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Nov; 68(2):353-7. PubMed ID: 17920222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Towards optimization in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo modelling.
Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Hunt RA; Alm Carlsson G
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2729-43. PubMed ID: 16723762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Investigating the use of an antiscatter grid in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Smith A; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140613. PubMed ID: 25571914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Automatic exposure control calibration and optimisation for abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine imaging with an Agfa computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Joshi H; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N551-N564. PubMed ID: 27716642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D.
Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An optimisation strategy in a digital environment applied to neonatal chest imaging.
Hansson J; Båth M; Håkansson M; Grundin H; Bjurklint E; Orvestad P; Kjellström A; Boström H; Jönsson M; Jonsson K; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15933122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: part of image background acting as pure noise.
Båth M; Håkansson M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Grahn A; Bochud FO; Verdun FR; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):102-8. PubMed ID: 15933089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Automatic quantitative low contrast analysis of digital chest phantom radiographs.
Kwan AL; Filipow LJ; Le LH
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 12674230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Anthropomorphic versus geometric chest phantoms: a comparison of scatter properties.
Baydush AH; Ghem WC; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):894-7. PubMed ID: 10841391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Regional improvement of signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios in dual-screen CR chest imaging--a phantom study.
Liu X; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2001 Jun; 28(6):1080-92. PubMed ID: 11439477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Circle of Willis at CT angiography: dose reduction and image quality--reducing tube voltage and increasing tube current settings.
Waaijer A; Prokop M; Velthuis BK; Bakker CJ; de Kort GA; van Leeuwen MS
Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):832-9. PubMed ID: 17229873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Correlation of contrast-detail analysis and clinical image quality assessment in chest radiography with a human cadaver study.
De Crop A; Bacher K; Van Hoof T; Smeets PV; Smet BS; Vergauwen M; Kiendys U; Duyck P; Verstraete K; D'Herde K; Thierens H
Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):298-304. PubMed ID: 22056687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
